Categories
All About Guns Allies

7 Best Law Enforcement Revolvers of All Time by Sheriff Jim Wilson

7 Best Law Enforcement Revolvers of All Time

An interesting question was raised just the other day as to what have been the greatest law enforcement revolvers. I suppose you could look at it from several different perspectives. You might consider those guns that were the trend setters or you might tally up the guns that have had the highest production numbers. Or, you might just go with your favorites. And I suppose that there is nothing wrong with any of that.

When I first put on the badge of a Texas peace officer, the revolver was king. So I have a bit more than just academic interest in the subject. For my list, I have combined durability, longevity, and trend setting to come up with what I consider the seven greats.

Colt Single Action Army



Having been introduced in 1873, the Colt SAA enjoys 148 years of popularity although it is no longer considered a premier fighting gun.  But, for about 75 years, it was the gun that most savvy lawmen chose and with good reason.  Chambered in over 30 calibers (can you name them all?), the Colt was accurate enough to get the job done.  And, just as important, it was a robust handgun that could often, in the old days, be a substitute for a billy-club.  After all this time, it is still considered one of the iconic American handguns.

Smith & Wesson Model 10

The revolver that we call the Model 10 started life as the .38 Hand Ejector Model of 1899. Then, along came some military contracts and Smith & Wesson decided to call it the Military & Police model before finally settling on the Model 10. In its lifetime, some 6 million of the guns have been produced.

I would also venture to guess that more law enforcement officers have carried some version of the Model 10 (or its stainless versions…or its magnum versions) than any other handgun. There are several reasons for this popularity. The Model 10 is a medium-frame gun that is comfortable to carry during long hours of shift duty.

Its most popular caliber, .38 Spl., was relatively easy for most shooters to control. And the action was surprisingly smooth, and could be made even smoother by a good pistolsmith. Not as flamboyant as the magnums and other big-bore guns, the Model 10 was just a quality workhorse that could get the job done when an officer paid attention to the business at hand.

Smith & Wesson Triple Lock

The .44 Hand Ejector New Century was only manufactured from 1908 to 1915, with only about 15,000 guns made during that time. However, it showed the shooting world what Smith & Wesson was capable of building in a large-frame sixgun. And it created a line of descendants that are still with us today.

The Triple Lock became the foundation for the development of the .357 Magnum, .41 Magnum, and the .44 Magnum. If an officer had hands big enough to manage the large frame, he was well armed with just about any of the big frame Smith & Wessons. As an aside, though, I wonder just how many lawmen would have ever chosen the gun in .44 Magnum if Dirty Harry had not led the way.

Smith & Wesson Model 19

Border Patrol fast-draw expert Bill Jordan was one of the main ones to prevail upon Smith & Wesson to build a medium-frame revolver chambered for the .357 Magnum cartridge. Jordan suggested the adjustable sights, heavy barrel, and shrouded ejector rod as well and the results became known at the Combat Magnum. I carried one for many years…heck, I’ve still go four of them and use them often. Comfortable to carry, smooth action, extremely accurate, it was truly a lawman’s dream.

Back in those days, we practiced with .38 target loads and reserved our magnum ammo for serious use.  However, when departments began to mandate an officer practicing with the same ammo that he used on the street, we found that a steady diet of magnum loads could cause some serious trouble for these revolvers.  Thus, the Model 19 & 66 (the stainless version) revolvers gave way to the fine L-frame series and the tradition continued.

Colt Detective Special



Since its introduction in 1927, the Colt Detective Special has been a popular choice for plain-clothes detectives and off-duty carry. It is also the oldest of the modern snubnosed revolvers, predating the good S&W Model 36 by almost 25 years.

Colt employee J.H. FitzGerald started the trend when he would cut down the 4-inch Colt Police Positive to make custom belly guns for savvy lawmen and special friends. The popularity of the Detective Special paved the way for all of the snubnose guns that we’ve seen, and continue to see, today. It was definitely a trend setter.

Colt Python

Introduced in 1955, I suspect that the Python was designed by Colt for use in bullseye pistol matches which, in those days, the revolver ruled. However, most of us considered it the true Cadillac of cop guns, with its smooth action and great accuracy.

The Python also used a slightly larger frame than the S&W Model 19 which allowed us to handle the .357 Magnum cartridge a bit more efficiently. While you could buy a Model 19 for about $80, the Python sold for $125, but when you saw a lawman packing one, you could pretty well bet that he knew a thing or two about shooting handguns and was probably not a rookie.

Ruger Security-Six

Not to be outdone, Ruger introduced the Security-Six in 1972. It utilized investment casting and other manufacturing innovations to build a good revolver and keep the cost to a minimum at the same time—a fact that working cops really appreciated.

From 1972 to 1988, the Ruger DA family expanded to include stainless guns, as well as the original blue, and spin-off models of the Service-Six and Speed-Six. Typical of Ruger, the Security-Six was a lot of gun for the money. But it was just a bit too lightweight for steady use of magnum ammo, so the company beefed it up here and there and called it the GP100.

So there you have my picks for the seven great law enforcement revolvers. What’s that? I left out your favorite? Well, let us hear from you and tell us why your favorite is…well…your favorite.

Categories
All About Guns Well I thought it was neat!

MDGA

image.png

Categories
War

Spooks and Cowboys, Gooks and Grunts Part 2 (1975)

https://youtu.be/CKF6oXad_ow?list=RDCMUCsoahoJ3yhDQnsi4W2WImRA

Categories
War

Spooks and Cowboys, Gooks and Grunts Part 1 (1975)

https://youtu.be/yOmQoADOQWs

Categories
All About Guns

The First S&W .38: The "Baby Russian"

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft Gear & Stuff

Cheap Shotguns For Home Defense

Categories
All About Guns

A S&W Model 18 no dash in caliber 22 LR

Smith Wesson Model 18

 

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Gun Owners of CA’s Founder STILL Raising the Left’s Blood Pressure – Yippee! BY L.A. PAREDES

It’s no surprise to us but Gun Owners of California’s late founder is still making the Left’s blood pressure rise. And boy, does this make us smile.

Long after he retired from the California State Senate, H.L. “Bill” Richardson continued to be a media favorite as the guy who would pull-no-punches and colorfully tell it like it is, whether it was about the 2nd Amendment, freedom or his love of America. And were he still with us today, we know damn well he’d stand proudly with the “domestic terrorists” – also known as concerned parents – who have had the courage to recently stand up to the jack-booted thuggery of our government and educational bureaucracy.

To see his name elevated by an East Coast Leftist as one of the chief architects of this current political movement thrills us at GOC to our core:

“One blueprint that conservative activists have adopted comes from the book “Confrontational Politics” by the late H.L Richardson, a former California state senator and gun-rights activist.” – Joseph D. Bastrimovich

True. The popular “Confrontational Politics” does provide a blueprint on how to engage effectively with the Left, and yes, it has been adopted by smart activists over the past 30 years.

But then the fiction is rolled out:

“They’ve [activists] brought scrutiny upon themselves for aggressive tactics, which include being deliberately disruptive, shouting down school board members and even threatening violence toward those they see as enemies. These have become commonly used tactics for other conservative groups.”

Aggressive tactics? Deliberately disruptive? Threatening violence? At this point, I’d ask if the guy had even read the book, but realistically it doesn’t matter because he proves the book’s point that “Dogs bark, jackasses bray, snakes wiggle and liberals lie, it’s their nature to do so.”  Let’s leave it at that.

Throughout Richardson’s career and beyond, he called the Left out at every opportunity. Why? Because letting them march ahead without a challenge is a sign of weakness – and the Left knows most resistance on the right is exactly that…weak. That’s why learning how to effectively confront is key. To the average citizen, confrontation is not perceived as a tactic, a method of achieving a given end. However, to the Leftist, it is. To quote from the book, “they view confrontation as a verbal game, a form of semantic warfare to achieve a specific end, a strategy of bluff and bluster, a tactic used to accomplish a political goal, a technique to put an opponent on the defensive.”

The bottom line is that confrontation makes many people uncomfortable because it invokes negative emotions and is perceived as “unsociable behavior.” This actually makes the average American vulnerable, and often the victim of their own decency.

Liberals attribute our civility as weakness and deem our opposition to their agenda as desperate.  They think we are buffoons, simpletons, adhering to ideas that are no longer relevant. Thus, understanding their verbal strategies is the first step in being able to combat them – and make no mistake about it – combat them we must. To do otherwise is to abdicate not only the field of American politics, but our homes, families and businesses as well.

For every individual who challenges their local school board or battles unconstitutional gun laws in front of an over-reaching city council – becoming proficient in confrontation is a wise tool to have in your belt. Nothing annoys a Leftist more than an effective conservative.

There’s simply no need to avoid conflict – especially if done well and with control. There’s no need to be nasty. Use perseverance and professionalism. To be effective, positive confrontation requires a positive attitude.

There are teachable moments every step of the way as we battle the evils of the world. We must learn to build alliances and collect residuals in any and all confrontations with the Left – even when facing temporary setbacks or losses. From each conflict something can and must be gained – experience, friendships, political skills, fundraising files, and an evaluation of talent. Understanding how this works will prevent any wilting from the hot pressure of politics. Besides, the Left getting their panties in a bunch because parents are justifiably getting loud these days just demonstrates what a bunch of whiny, insecure adolescents they are.

In closing, GOC sends a big THANK YOU to Joseph D. Bastrimovich of National Park New Jersey, not for his defamatory remarks (read them HERE) about concerned parents, but for providing a brand new forum for GOC to highlight the value of Confrontational Politics (to his credit, Bastrimovich did link to a superb article on Richardson’s passing.)  But to see what all the fuss is about, you can secure your own copy of Confrontational Politics at the GOC store HERE.

GOC is encouraged by a newly energized electorate and is pleased to announce that we will be re-launching our Confrontational Politics workshops. For more information, contact us at (916) 984-1400 or email at laurie@gunownersca.com

 

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Anti-hunting Activists Still Blame Hunters for Condor Deaths By Larry Keane

California Condor iStock-495123612
Anti-hunters continue blaming lead ammo for the deaths of California Condors IMG iStock-495123612

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- California banned the use of traditional ammunition statewide in 2019, but anti-hunting activists continue to blame traditional ammunition made with lead components for the deaths of the scavengers.

Mike Stake, a wildlife biologist with the Ventana Wildlife Society in California, told KCBX that of the 13 deaths of California condors in 2020, nine were attributed to lead poisoning. Anti-hunting activists have long blamed traditional ammunition for the condor deaths. They theorize that these scavengers would feed on animal carcasses or even gut piles left behind by hunters ingesting lead fragments from hunters’ ammunition as the source of lead poisoning.

That caused California lawmakers to pass a law in 2013 that began a phased traditional ammunition ban for all hunting in California. The ban was fully implemented statewide by July 1, 2019.

For two years, no hunters have been allowed to use anything but more expensive alternative ammunition. California’s Department of Fish and Wildlife reported 98.89% hunter compliance with the regulation. If hunters aren’t using traditional ammunition, how do anti-hunting activists still blame traditional ammunition for lead poisoning in California condors?

Are Hunters to Blame?

Ventana Wildlife Society didn’t study why condors are still getting sick from lead, despite it being banned for hunting. Instead, they speculate. Without proof, Stake told KCBX that hunters must be skirting the rules since ammunition is in high demand these days.

“But the law does permit the sale and purchase of lead ammunition because it’s still legal to use in target ranges where wildlife is not the target,” KCBX reported. That’s right. They are now saying condors must be consuming lead from hunters who break the law, even though California authorities say this isn’t the case, or condors are eating lead out of the berms and fields of gun ranges.

That’s a stretch unsupported by any science, but not one that anti-hunting and anti-gun activists haven’t already made. The original data upon which California based the law to ban traditional ammunition for hunting is suspect. Hunt for Truth Association pored over the reports submitted to California lawmakers and found those reports were deeply biased. The condor population did crash, but it wasn’t due to hunters using traditional ammunition.

A combination of habitat destruction and “use of DDT, other organochlorine pesticides, and certain rodenticides throughout the remaining condor habitat in Central and Southern California had serious and significant impacts on condor populations.”

The group’s research looked directly at data regarding condor consumption of lead. It found that it wasn’t as easy as singling out lead fragments from animal carcasses leftover by hunters.

Questioning Data

“While some researchers maintain that lead ammunition from gut piles or game carrion left in the field by hunters is the primary source of lead exposure to condors, there is compelling evidence of alternative sources of lead in the environment,” Hunt for Truth reported. “Such alternative sources of lead include paint chips from old buildings, legacy leaded gasoline in soils, mining wastes, old insecticides, and micro trash.”

Two condors that were studied were actually observed eating paint chips from a fire lookout tower. Those condors were later observed regurgitating those paint fragments to feed their chicks.

“Rarely, if ever, has an actual projectile fragment been found in the digestive tract of a California condor,” the report continued“However, objects that were thought to be projectile fragments were subsequently found to be pieces of gravel or a ‘woody’ substance, not from ammunition.”

Hunt for Truth didn’t pull punches on questioning the studies.

“Hunt for Truth has discovered that many of these researchers ‘cherry-picked’ this information, deleting it and often refusing to present the underlying information to scientific peer review, policymakers, and the public at large. This activity by the researchers calls their very claims and conclusions into serious question,” the group stated in the report. Information about condor deaths was intentionally suppressed by the Obama-era U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and not provided to California legislators when they were considering expanding the ban statewide because it did not support the narrative that hunters were to blame.

Still, falsely blaming hunters for using traditional ammunition two years after the ban was in effect even after California authorities conclude hunters are complying isn’t just bad form. It’s bad science. Making unsubstantiated claims based on hearsay is antithetical to setting science-based policies.

California hunters stopped using traditional ammunition two years ago. If condors are still getting sick from poisoning, it’s not because carcasses have been lying in the wild for over two years. Something else is going on and it’s time anti-hunting activists come clean on their agenda.


About The National Shooting Sports Foundation

NSSF is the trade association for the firearm industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of thousands of manufacturers, distributors, firearm retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations, and publishers nationwide. For more information, visit nssf.org

Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

Shark week is coming back soon to you!