This is a Winchester Model 92 rifle that someone went to a lot of trouble to look like a Winchester Model 53.
The barrel was replaced with a M53 barrel from 1929, the magazine tube was replaced with a button mag, the markings were ground off the upper tang, the lower tang was replaced with a pistol grip tang, and both stocks were replaced, the buttstock with one having a checkered pistol grip.
When the Model 53 rifles were first made, some used M92 receivers and some had serial numbers from the M92 range, but this receiver was made in 1907, long before the Model 53s were produced. The bore is bright with sharp rifling and no erosion.
Big bore guns are a way of life in Alaska. Whether handgun or rifle the need is the same: stopping large animals quickly. Wild West Guns began building the Co-Pilot lever gun over 20 years ago. The take-down rifle is designed to easily fit in a plane, boat, vehicle, pack, or scabbard and stop the largest of North America’s game.
Shielded rear peep sight and XS WWG front sight add reliable backup for the removable scope.
WWG takes a standard stainless steel 18” barreled Marlin 1895 lever gun and works it over from one end to the other. Assembled, the Co-Pilot’s overall length is 36 ¾ inches. In just a minute’s time, it is in two halves. The longest half is 19 inches, which is small enough to fit in a leather or canvas satchel or pack.
The take-down feature is accomplished by adding a plate to the rear of the barrel half that holds the barrel, forearm and magazine tube assembly, as well as the barrel-mounted scout scope. The plate acts as the mating surface to the machined front of the receiver. The magazine tube is held in place at the muzzle end by a thumb screw threaded into an insert in the bottom of the barrel.
The barrel porting works exceptionally well at taming the muzzle rise.
Unscrewing the thumb screw allows pulling the magazine tube out past the muzzle, which pulls it out of the receiver, allowing the barrel section to unscrew from the receiver. The bottom end of the magazine tube is tapered and acts as a large alignment pin to center the barrel section with the receiver. The clearance between the mating faces of the two sections is almost nonexistent and unnoticeable if you’re not looking for it.
Exacting tolerances ensure fit of the two halves, flawless function, and accuracy.
The barrel threads into the receiver to rigidly hold the two halves together. The magazine tube fits into the recess of the receiver, locking the halves. All the work on the alignment, mating surfaces, and threading enhances the accuracy of the Co-Pilot and makes it a compact travel package.
Barrel mounted scope allows disassembly of rifle without loss of zero.
The work done on the Co-Pilot does not end at the take-down feature, which is just the beginning. To say the action of the Co-Pilot is smooth would be an understatement. With some factory guns, you can almost feel every process happening when you cycle the lever through the range of motion. This is not the case with the Co-Pilot. The action glides through the lever stroke swiftly, smoothly, and reliably. The large cases feed in and out of the action as if they were greased.
I was lucky enough to take the Co-Pilot on a hog hunt and though the hogs were nowhere to be found during the day, I did get to try it out on a couple after darkness fell. During the heat of the moment, while firing three shots at a running hog, I didn’t even notice that I was shooting a lever gun instead of my usual semi-auto. The action is that smooth and reliable.
After downing the second hog I found myself checking the action to make sure I had chambered a fresh round and was ready for another. Both hogs were in the 140-150 pound range and never made it 50 yards before dropping.
The lightning-fast handling nature of the gun made it a pleasure to carry and use for the hunt. At less than eight pounds it was no problem carry for miles of walking, stalking, waiting and watching during the day or for the stalks to the hogs when we located them at night. I guess I need to invest in a .45 caliber suppressor because the thunderous roar that it lets out in the still of the night would make Thor himself tremble.
Friends with cool equipment helped put the Co-Pilot to the hog test.
The Co-Pilot obviously uses a WWG big loop lever, trigger, and ejector. The action has been polished and tuned to give the best performance possible. The trigger broke cleanly at 3 lbs. That’s the kind of trigger that you don’t typically find on lever guns. The fine trigger made breaking shots at the running hogs reflexive rather than a conscious action, and instantly it was ready to shoot again—never a glitch or hang-up of any kind in feeding or ejecting.
WWG scope mount allowed rock-solid mounting of the scope or laser used for night hunting.
The Co-Pilot can be had with a standard handguard or the modified Midwest Industries tactical style as on the test gun. The forearm can be used for mounting lights, lasers or whatever accessories the user needs.
The thick reticle was quick to pick up and excellent for engaging close range targets.
The Co-Pilot utilized a Leupold FX-II 2.5x 28mm Scout style scope. The low power and heavy reticle of the Leupold aren’t made for long distance shooting; they are designed for up-close quick shooting. This scope weighs only 9 ½ ounces. The lightweight helps maintain a nice balance on the rifle and keeps the handling more like an iron sighted gun than a top-heavy scoped one.
Specifications
Caliber: 457 WWG or 45-70
Barrel Length: 18 inch, ported
Weight: 7lbs. 13 oz.
Length Assembled: 36 ¾ in
Length Disassembled- 19 in
Capacity: 6+1
Trigger pull: 3 lbs.
Finish: Stainless Steel with Black Nitride (test gun)
Stock: Composite (tested) or laminated wood
Price from $3277
The heavy coarse reticle doesn’t mean that the Co-Pilot isn’t capable of shooting well. The Co-Pilot shot almost one hole groups at 50 yards with Hornady 250 grain 45-70 LEVERevolution ammunition. The flyer was probably due to the reticle and my focus. The Remington 405 grain bullets shot almost as well the Hornady 45-70 loads.
The test gun was chambered in the SAMMI approved 457 WWG cartridge, a longer variant of the original 45-70 chambering. The 457 WWG packs in some extra punch for those potential close encounters in heavy brush. In addition, the 457 WWG chambering still allows shooting the 45-70 Government cartridge and also single loading 2 1/2 inch 410 shot shells for close range small game or pests.
The Co-Pilot shot some amazing groups with multiple ammunition types and easily hit steel out to 150 yards.
The 250 grain Hornady load, which is sufficient for hunting most game, was actually pleasant to shoot in the Co-Pilot. The barrel porting and Pachmayr Decelerator recoil pad working together even tamed the 350-grain Corbon WWG loads allowing me to shoot reasonable groups. I have certainly shot less comfortable guns and felt that for the energy of the rounds and weight of the rifle it performed very well.
The energy of the Corbon 457 WWG load is something worth a quick look in itself. At 4112 ft-lbs. of muzzle energy, it is in the class with the 300 Weatherby and 338 Winchester Magnum rounds. This is about 2 ½ times the energy of the original slow moving 405 grain 45/70 loads; impressive power in a light-fast rifle.
Even with the low power optic and thick post, hunting accuracy is no problem for the 457 WWG Co-Pilot.
Due to weather and time constraints, the 457 WWG loads were shot for groups as darkness was falling and I know I did not do it justice. I feel I had some variance in getting a consistent hold with the point of the reticle on the target center as the light was fading and this probably accounts for the vertical stringing of the groups. My apologies to the Wild West Team.
Due to the wide range of bullet weights and velocity differences, the point of impact for every load tested was several inches different. So as always be sure to zero with the ammunition you will be using on a hunt and tailor the bullet type to the game you will be shooting.
The difference in length of the high energy 457 WWG rounds and the Hornady brass cases is easily seen here.
The Co-Pilot can be had almost any way you want it, from finely engraved with beautiful wood to finished with the most durable coatings to keep it working in the harshest environments.The gun I tested was a Black Nitride finished stainless steel rifle with a composite buttstock, though mostly they sell stainless with laminated wood stocks carrying the WWG’s logo. You can have it with a ported barrel such as the test gun or without ports and threaded for use with a suppressor. You can literally have it your way.
This no-nonsense performer is ready to hunt anything you are.
Final Thoughts
The Wild West Guns Co-Pilot is a short, light, fast handling, accurate, easily shootable, hammer of a rifle that has an awesomely smooth action, fine trigger and easily disassembles down to a compact travel size package. The workmanship is obvious in the tuning, precision, and assembly of the rifle.
We don’t all have a float plane so it may not be a gun we all need, but if you’re a lever gun fan, it’s surely one you will want. I hate to send it back. This design is all about function and performance.
Townsend Whelen was one of the great American riflemen of the past. He’s one of the people who worked to bring us some of the best of riflery. Germán Salazar has a nice biography of him here. Thewikipedia entry is appallingly brief, but it does tell us that his friends called him “Townie” and that “An expert rifleman with few peers, Whelen could reportedly hit man-sized target at 200 yards using the bolt action, open-sighted M1903 Springfield.30/06 service rifle, scoring six hits in ten seconds flat, and could do it on command.” That’s pretty fast shooting with good accuracy for the speed. I decided to take the challenge up for myself.
Let’s examine the difficulties. I don’t know what they mean by “man-sized target”. If we omit the legs of a man, we might have a target of approximately 36” in height. As far as width, I’m guessing about 24” to the edge of each shoulder. Because Townie was a world class rifleman, let’s assume that his target was a bit smaller, something on the order of 18” x 28”. At 200 yards your accuracy standard should be better than 9 moa. Not hard at all until you factor in the rate of fire.
His rifle was a long action turnbolt, essentially a copy of the Mauser K98. The internal magazine held 5 rounds. Since he fired 6 times, I’m guessing he also had one in the chamber prior to starting. That means that part of his 10 seconds is going to involve working the bolt at least 5 times. Townie was apparently somewhat of an authority on bolt work. Let’s examine that aspect of the problem. The length of pull (LOP) for the 1903 is known as being “short”. I searched for dimensions and came up with “short” everywhere I looked. I’ll call my LOP “long” at 14.25”. With my long LOP I can get by working the bolt while keeping my cheekweld without getting hit in the face by the bolt shroud.
In prone I have trouble reaching the bolt knob, which leaves me working it without using my thumb, or leaning right. Leaning to the side increases the reach and leverage of the hand working the bolt. For an odd task such firing rapidly at a single target from a relatively long (in combat terms) distance, the faster technique must be favored at the expense of maintaining a perfect sight picture throughout the bolt cycling.
I’m not sure exactly why, call it rifleman’s instinct, but for some reason I assumed without thinking about it that Townie would have used the prone position for this feat of skill. I didn’t question that assumption until I started working at it. Now I’m not sure if another position would better balance the accuracy and speed needed for this specific skill.I’m still working it in prone, but leaving my options open.
If we can take the wikipedia entry at face value (it is the internet after all, what could go wrong?), Townie was using open sights. This would seem to place him at a disadvantage to an aperture sight or optic. I don’t think this would have been too great a disadvantage to him in this case. First, he doesn’t need to be close to the rear sight, as when using an aperture, so it gives him enough eye relief to have plenty of “bolt relief”. Secondly, once he has his NPA, he really doesn’t need to realign his sights; he just needs to verify that his sight picture is still acceptable. Note that all you need is a hit; it doesn’t need to be a perfect shot. Hitting a “man size” target at 200 yards, even with open sights, is not too much of a problem in the way of sighting.
After a lot of guessing based on a sentence from a Wikipedia article, I found one of his books at the library. He never mentioned “man sized target” or 6 shots in 10 seconds, but he did mention, in a discussion of bolt action rifles that “Six shots in 12 seconds, all of the striking within a 20 inch bull’s eye at 200 yards was a common and not particularly remarkable performance on the part of members of the Army Infantry Rifle team during the years 1907 to 1909, with the Springfield rifle which has a Mauser type of mechanism” (The Hunting Rifle; 39).
When I originally read about this, I thought, “Cool, something else to try, then write about.” I knew that I currently was not able to do it, so it gives an opportunity for improvement. The problem for me would be to find a way to operate the bolt in a slung prone position as quickly as I could in offhand.
My equipment is a little bit different than Townie’s. I don’t own a 1903, or I would try it with one. I have #1 (my Sako 75). Like the 1903, it’s chambered in 30-06. The action length is similar. The differences would be that the Sako has a shorter bolt lift. I also have a scope instead of open sights. This is a big advantage that I can’t really do anything about. The only thing that comes to mind is to reduce the size of the target.
I found that one of the main problems I had in live fire was that the butt has a tendency to slip from the shoulder. Townie had some advice for me. One tip was to utilize the support hand to pull the butt into the shoulder while working the bolt. Good. That will help. Another tip was to use the cheek to press into the rifle. I had already stumbled into that for offhand, but had not thought to apply it here. Another tip was to wet the stock so that it will adhere slightly to the shoulder. Interesting…
I spent a couple weeks dry firing to get my speed together in prone with the sling. This was not a fast combination up to this point, but I figured out what I needed to do to get the bolt going, which was basically to compromise my position after each shot. Luckily, this was not a super precise shot.
I used the metronome to build my speed in dry fire. I got up to about 72 BPM. I wasn’t sure if this was fast enough. I had a feeling that I might not make the 10 second time limit, but that it would be close. I wanted to at least make the 12 second limit that I had read about in Townie’s book.
I tried a couple of practice runs at 100 yards on a 10” paper plate. On about shot 4, the butt would slip out of the shoulder pocket. My accuracy was fine, just under 4”, but my time was a bit over. I tried to work on the slipping problem in dry fire after this.
My target at 200 yards was steel, so I could document this in video and give the viewer instant feedback. The target is a humanoid steel target approximately 13” wide, 23” from top of the head to bottom of target, and approximately 18.5” in height not counting the head, which was not part of my intended target. I was shooting #1, my Sako 75 Hunter, chambered in 30-06 Springfield. My Leupold Vari-X 3 was set to the minimum zoom setting, ~3.5. I was using a TAB gear standard sling. I had 5 rounds in the mag and one in the chamber. On my first run, the butt slipped again on shot 4. I only had a little daylight, a little time, and enough ammo for one more run. I then remembered that one of Townie’s tips was to wet the shoulder to butt interface. Check out my bottle of Aquafina in the following video:
You can time it like I did and it should come out to just over 11 seconds from the 1st shot to the 6th. All shots hit steel. I didn’t measure my group at the time, but from a photo, it appears as though it’s approximately 9.75”, which would make it in the ballpark of 4.6 MOA.
A photo of me and my buddy Steele. About the new face: a reader, who is also a well respected rifleman, suggested something more dignified than blacking my face out. Ask, and you shall receive…
Obviously this is over the 10 second limit, but according to Townie it’s good enough to hang with him on his team. Also, figure in that I’m not the commander of the Frankford Arsenal or a member of an armed forces shooting team, and there you have it. It was the gap between shots 1 and 2, and 4 and 5 that got me. I tend to be a little slow out the gate, and the bolt work following shot 4 was slightly flubbed. Even if I’d have gotten it, I can’t do it “on command” yet.
Watching the video is interesting for me, because I clearly break my cheekweld. I don’t notice this in practice, in fact I can still see through the scope. I had also expected more body movement (reaching for the bolt knob) than there actually is. I recommend recording a video of yourself so you can nitpick.
Here’s the rating system breakdown for a clean run:
Over 30 seconds: Why did you even try this, get to workin’ that bolt son!
Over 20 seconds: See above.
Over 15 seconds: More dry fire in the future for you I see, hmm, yes.
Over 12 seconds: Nice try kid.
Over 10 seconds: He’s good… with my help he could be the best
Under 10 seconds: May your shooting career be glorious and your wikipedia
entry brief, Mister Rifleman!
Under 7 seconds: STANGSKYTER!!!
Here’s someone who can get 6 off in under 7 seconds, then reload and fire another 2 under 10 seconds, with a higher degree of accuracy than I was trying for:
What’s the point of all this? It’s fun, and it’s a challenge. Is it worth it to get to the stangskyting level? Not for me. Is it useful? That’s a better question to ask in order to guide our practice. Here’s an easy test question to get to the bottom of this: Ten crows are sitting around a dumpster. You shoot one. How many are left around the dumpster? If you answered 9 your math is fine but your common sense needs work. The practice of firing rapid fire at a single target is really only useful in order to develop the consistency to be assured that your first shot is going to hit, and the speed to be ready for a second shot. That’s really it. The first shot is worth more than all the others combined.
I may revisit this type of shooting, but for now I’ll be moving on to less conventional, more practical type shooting.