Month: June 2018
This would make a nice gift to any starting out / seasoned Shooter! As the 22 Long Rifle Round has a lot to teach almost any shooter!









Turkey Huh!?!
Grumpy
Like most of us if we’ve done our “homework” and researched our next purchase: be it a Smart TV, a camera, handgun or tires for your truck, we’ll end up eventually selecting an item knowing that it has “almost” all the features and qualities we had on our wish list. It is a pretty good bet that the guys who engineered the new SAR 9 from SAR USA have felt the same way. Being engineers, however, they are in a good position to actually do something about those “wish list” shortcomings. Enter SAR USA and with it the SAR 9.
For those unfamiliar, Sarsilmaz produces thousands of firearms for over 78 nations from its 1-million square foot facility in Turkey. Its the sole provider of the duty pistols to the Turkish army, which is the second largest force in NATO. The SAR 9 has been adopted by Turkish armed forces. With its long-standing tradition of weapon innovation, Sarsilmaz was founded in 1880 in Istanbul, Turkey. SAR USA has begun importing these pistols into the United States and pistol are expected to arrive on dealer shelves this week.
SPECS:
- Type: Striker-fired semiauto pistol
- Cartridge: 9×19 Para
- Capacity: 17+1 rds.
- Trigger: 5 lbs., 8 oz. (tested)
- Weight: 27 oz.
- Barrel Length: 4.4 in.
- Overall Length: 7.5 in.
- Height: 5.5 in.
- Sights: Steel 3-Dot; drift adj. (rear)
- Grips: Configurable with included inserts
- Frame Finish: Polymer
- MSRP: $449
- Manufacturer: Sarsilmaz
Ergonomics
Now, you or I may not have considered all the following wish list items for a great handgun, but this layout really comes together. It’s a striker-fired pistol with an action described by SAR USA as, “a patented double-action-style trigger that is pounds lighter than traditional double actions.” I am thinking that “traditional double actions” must mean like a CZ75 SA/DA gun, as then the “pounds lighter” would certainly be correct. The SAR9 trigger stroke is about .300 inch long and pulls along at 5 pounds, 8 ounces, all the way to the striker let-off. Yes, I parsed my words there … the trigger pull, if drawn straight through as you would (should) a DA revolver is fully usable. How did I come to this conclusion? I shot a couple of “steel challenge” competitions with it right out of the box and neither the trigger nor the gun held me back from a win at both local clubs. That said, the trigger is, shall we say, gritty.
Next, we have the grip frame. SAR engineers must have had an HK VP9 (or something like it) nearby as the SAR9’s grip is VERY similar in shape and modularity. And that is a good thing. It feels really good in the hands. The magazine well definitely has a leg up on my favorite plastic fantastic Glocks as it is more generous in accepting magazines at speed. In other words, I love this grip frame.
Article Continues Below
As you look through the photos you’ll notice some striking similarities to a very popular polymer gun’s fire controls. The trigger has a safety dongle: check. Trigger bar has a cruciform: check. The trigger has a trigger spring and a “connector” to roll the cruciform off the striker’s leg. Striker and striker spring: check. All very Glockesque. This is not a bad thing, in my mind. Especially if you know your way around “improving” a Glock trigger! Grit-b-gone!
The slide and barrel could be about any other design and that is just fine. If you are wondering about running lead bullets, you are in luck, the barrel sports conventional rifling. If you have concerns about supported chambers, no worries in that regard either. The front sight accepts those that would fit a Glock and the rear looks for all the world to be a Novak (at least in the dovetail size) and both are made of steel. Extraction is handled by a beefy unit that is reminiscent of one on my SIG Sauer 1911 and that works for me. If you need to know if you have one in the chamber, the extractor has a “bump” on it if you are so inclined to use that method of checking readiness. Return to battery is handled by a dual recoil spring assembly that runs on a steel guide rod.
Ok, now we come to the 300-pound Gorilla in the room — what are those funny wing things on each side of the frame? They’re ambidextrous thumb safeties. You may not want or need them, but I can tell you first hand they are not a hindrance in bringing this gun to bear on those pesky steel targets. Other than the off-side lever rubbing against my right hand, I actually like this setup. These safeties truly fall right where they should under the thumb and are neither prone to being bumped on under recoil, nor off when holstered. They are active safeties and it is up to you if you want to activate them and run it like a Glock. However, if you are opposed to them, word on the street is a model of this gun is available sans these units.
Digging a little further into this neat little 9mm you will see a “cassette” or “fire control module” but I wouldn’t call either description 100% correct. The folded steel “carrier” for the locking block, trigger, connector and ejector housing is open on one end so that the preceding parts can be removed for service. Removing this “carrier” is not difficult at all provided you have a 1/16-inch roll pin punch to drive the pin from the “off-side” safety level. After that you have two more push pins at the takedown lever, and a second crosspin lower and in front of that.
As you can see the “carrier” has 4 burly tabs, one at each corner, so the slide will travel “to and fro” with boring repeatability. A solid set-up for sure.
While blasting better than 400 rounds at two steel shooting matches this gun did not miss a beat. When I broke a shot with the sights in close proximity to the intended target, I was consistently rewarded with a satisfying ting. I will add that the point of aim versus point of impact was quite a bit right as the rear sight favors that side of the slide. While the SAR9 did point a little high for me at first, after a couple of presentations it “aimed” where I was aiming.
During my bench testing accuracy phase, I did have two malfunctions. They were not quite a classic stove pipe but I did have two fired cases get trapped between the breech face and the barrel hood. Not sure what the cause was, but it never happened again. Speaking of accuracy, I am hard to please when it comes to accuracy. I want every $400 dollar gun to shoot under 2 inches at 25 yards. Well, the truth is most don’t. That kind of accuracy is generally within the purview of handguns that cost considerably more than the full retail price of this econo-blaster. That said, the SAR9 averaged under 2.25 inches at 25 yards. And it did that using five different kinds of ammo.
Lasting Impressions
Let’s wrap this thing up: yes, it has safeties, and yes, it takes some design cues from several good if not great guns on the market. Neither of those is a bad thing. What isn’t so good is the gritty trigger. Living with that is not a problem for me; I have shot it and shot it pretty well. The trigger may be a short-lived issue for you, if, as I said you have some “glocksmith” skills. It is reliable within the 400-plus rounds I fired sans the two malfunctions. Ergonomics fit me just fine and are adjustable to fit you. It feels great in the hand and is very “smooth shooting.” It is quick to reload “on the clock” so it can play well as a weekend competition gun, or after a few hundred more trouble-free rounds can be counted on to protect. Consider that it is within a quarter of an inch of passing my accuracy snob test and you get all that for an MSRP of $449. Yea, I am going to keep it. And you just might see a long-term test report before too long.
For more information about SAR USA, click here.
For more information about Federal & American Eagle ammunition, click here.
For more information about CCI ammunition, click here.
To purchase a SAR pistol on GunsAmerica, click here.
My kind of a guy!
For those too young to know this:
Augusto Pinochet
Augusto Pinochet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
President of Chile | |
In office 17 December 1974 – 11 March 1990 |
|
Preceded by | Salvador Allende |
Succeeded by | Patricio Aylwin |
President of the Government Junta of Chile
|
|
In office 11 September 1973 – 11 March 1982 |
|
Preceded by | Position established |
Succeeded by | José Toribio Merino |
In office 23 August 1973 – 11 March 1998 |
|
Preceded by | Carlos Prats |
Succeeded by | Ricardo Izurieta |
Senator for life of Chile | |
In office 11 March 1998 – 4 July 2002 |
|
Constituency | Former president |
Personal details | |
Born | Augusto José Ramón Pinochet Ugarte 25 November 1915 Valparaíso, Chile |
Died | 10 December 2006 (aged 91) Santiago, Chile |
Cause of death | Heart attack |
Nationality | Chilean |
Spouse(s) |
Lucía Hiriart (1943–2006; his death)
|
Children |
|
Alma mater | Chilean War Academy |
Occupation |
|
Profession | Soldier |
Signature | ![]() |
Military service | |
Allegiance | ![]() |
Service/branch | ![]() |
Years of service | 1931–1998 |
Rank | ![]() |
Unit |
|
Commands |
|
Battles/wars | 1973 Chilean coup d’état |
Augusto José Ramón Pinochet Ugarte (/ˈpiːnəˌʃeɪ/;[1] Spanish: [auˈɣusto pinoˈ(t)ʃe, -ˈ(t)ʃet];[2][A] 25 November 1915 – 10 December 2006) was a Chilean general, politician and the dictator of Chile between 1973 and 1990; he remained the Commander-in-Chief of the Chilean Army until 1998. He was also president of the Government Junta of Chile between 1973 and 1981.[3][4][5]
Pinochet assumed power in Chile following a United States-backed coup d’état on 11 September 1973 that overthrew the democratically elected socialist Unidad Popular government of President Salvador Allende and ended civilian rule. Several academics – including Peter Winn, Peter Kornbluh, Tim Weiner, and Christopher Hitchens – have stated that the support of the United States was crucial to the coup and the consolidation of power afterward.[6][7][8] Pinochet had been promoted to Commander-in-Chief of the Army by Allende on 23 August 1973, having been its General Chief of Staff since early 1972.[9] In December 1974, the ruling military juntaappointed Pinochet Supreme Head of the nation by joint decree, although without the support of one of the coup’s instigators, Air Force General Gustavo Leigh.[10]
Following his rise to power, Pinochet persecuted leftists and political critics, resulting in the executions of from 1,200 to 3,200 people,[11] the internment of as many as 80,000 people and the torture of tens of thousands.[12][13][14]According to the Chilean government, the amount of executions and forced disappearances was 3,095.[15]
Under the influence of the free market-oriented neoliberal “Chicago Boys“, the military government implemented economic liberalization, including currency stabilization, removed tariff protections for local industry, banned trade unions and privatized social security and hundreds of state-owned enterprises. These policies produced what has been referred to as the “Miracle of Chile” by right-wing libertarian Milton Friedman [16][17] but critics state that economic inequality dramatically increased and attribute the devastating effects of the 1982 monetary crisis on the Chilean economy to these policies.[18][19] Chile was, for most of the 1990s, the best-performing economy in Latin America, though the legacy of Pinochet’s reforms continues to be in dispute.[20]
His fortune grew considerably during his years in power through dozens of bank accounts secretly held abroad and a fortune in real estate. He was later prosecuted for embezzlement, tax fraud and for possible commissions levied on arms deals.[21]
Pinochet’s 17-year rule was given a legal framework through a controversial 1980 plebiscite, which approved a new Constitution drafted by a government-appointed commission. In a 1988 plebiscite 56% voted against Pinochet’s continuing as president, which led to democratic elections for the Presidency and Congress. After stepping down in 1990, Pinochet continued to serve as Commander-in-Chief of the Chilean Army until 10 March 1998, when he retired and became a senator-for-life in accordance with his 1980 Constitution. However, Pinochet was arrested under an international arrest warrant on a visit to London on 10 October 1998 in connection with numerous human rights violations. Following a legal battle he was released on grounds of ill-health, and returned to Chile on 3 March 2000. In 2004, Chilean Judge Juan Guzmán Tapia ruled that Pinochet was medically fit to stand trial and placed him under house arrest.[9] By the time of his death on 10 December 2006, about 300 criminal charges were still pending against him in Chile for numerous human rights violations during his 17-year rule, and tax evasion and embezzlement during and after his rule;[22] he was accused of having corruptly amassed at least 28 million USD.[23] Despite the indictment and 300 charges, he only served time in house arrest.
Contents
[hide]
Early life and military career[edit]
Pinochet was born in Valparaíso, the son of Augusto Pinochet Vera, a descendant of a French Breton immigrant from Lamballe, and Avelina Ugarte Martínez, a woman of Basque descent.[24] Pinochet went to primary and secondary school at the San Rafael Seminary of Valparaíso, the Rafael Ariztía Institute (Marist Brothers) in Quillota, the French Fathers’ School of Valparaíso, and then to the Military School in Santiago, which he entered in 1931. In 1935, after four years studying military geography, he graduated with the rank of alférez (Second Lieutenant) in the infantry. In September 1937, Pinochet was assigned to the “Chacabuco” Regiment, in Concepción. Two years later, in 1939, then with the rank of Sub-lieutenant, he moved to the “Maipo” Regiment, garrisoned in Valparaíso. He returned to Infantry School in 1940. On 30 January 1943, Pinochet married Lucía Hiriart Rodríguez, with whom he had five children: Inés Lucía, María Verónica, Jacqueline Marie, Augusto Osvaldo, and Marco Antonio.
By late 1945 Pinochet had been assigned to the “Carampangue” Regiment in the northern city of Iquique. Three years later, he entered the War Academy but had to postpone his studies because, being the youngest officer, he had to carry out a service mission in the coal zone of Lota. The following year he returned to his studies in the Academy, and after obtaining the title of Officer Chief of Staff, in 1951, he returned to teach at the Military School. At the same time, he worked as a teachers’ aide at the War Academy, giving military geography and geopolitics classes. He was also the editor of the institutional magazine Cien Águilas (“One Hundred Eagles”). At the beginning of 1953, with the rank of major, he was sent for two years to the “Rancagua” Regiment in Arica. While there, he was appointed professor of the Chilean War Academy, and returned to Santiago to take up his new position.[9]
In 1956 Pinochet and a group of young officers were chosen to form a military mission to collaborate in the organization of the War Academy of Ecuador in Quito. He remained with the Quito mission for four-and-a-half years, during which time he studied geopolitics, military geography and military intelligence. At the end of 1959 he returned to Chile and was sent to General Headquarters of the 1st Army Division, based in Antofagasta. The following year, he was appointed commander of the “Esmeralda” Regiment. Due to his success in this position, he was appointed Sub-director of the War Academy in 1963. In 1968, he was named Chief of Staff of the 2nd Army Division, based in Santiago, and at the end of that year, he was promoted to brigadier general and Commander in Chief of the 6th Division, garrisoned in Iquique. In his new function, he was also appointed Intendent of the Tarapacá Province.
In January 1971, Pinochet was promoted to division general and was named General Commander of the Santiago Army Garrison. At the beginning of 1972 he was appointed General Chief of Staff of the Army. With rising domestic strife in Chile, after General Prats resigned his position, Pinochet was appointed commander-in-chief of the Army on 23 August 1973 by President Salvador Allende just the day after the Chamber of Deputies of Chile approved a resolution asserting that the government was not respecting the Constitution. Less than a month later, the Chilean military deposed Allende.
Military coup of 1973[edit]
On 11 September 1973 the combined Chilean Armed Forces (the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Carabineros) overthrew Allende’s government in a coup, during which the presidential palace, La Moneda, was shelled and Allende committed suicide.[25] While the military claimed that he had committed suicide, controversy surrounded Allende’s death, with many claiming that he had been assassinated (theory discarded by the Chilean Supreme Court in 2014).[26]
In his memoirs Pinochet said that he was the leading plotter of the coup and had used his position as commander-in-chief of the Army to coordinate a far-reaching scheme with the other two branches of the military and the national police.[citation needed] In later years, however, high military officials from the time have said that Pinochet reluctantly became involved only a few days before the coup was scheduled to occur, and followed the lead of the other branches (especially the Navy, under Merino) as they executed the coup.[citation needed]
The new government rounded up thousands of people and held them in the national stadium where many were killed. This was followed by brutal repression during Pinochet’s rule, during which about 3,000 people were killed, and more than 1,000 are still missing.[27]
In the months that followed the coup, the junta, with authoring work by historian Gonzalo Vial and admiral Patricio Carvajal, published a book titled El Libro Blanco del cambio de gobierno en Chile (commonly known as El Libro Blanco, “The White Book on the Change of Government in Chile“), where they said that they were in fact anticipating a self-coup (the alleged Plan Zeta, or Plan Z) that Allende’s government or its associates were purportedly preparing. United States intelligence agencies believed the plan to be untrue propaganda.[28] Although later discredited and officially recognized as the product of political propaganda,[29] Gonzalo Vial insists in the similarities between the alleged Plan Z and other existing paramilitary plans of the Popular Unity parties in support of its legitimacy.[30]
Canadian Jean Charpentier of Télévision de Radio-Canada was the first foreign journalist to interview General Pinochet following the coup.[31]
U.S. backing of the coup[edit]

U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger with Pinochet in 1976
The Church Report investigating the fallout of the Watergate scandal stated that while the U.S. tacitly supported the Pinochet government after the 1973 coup, there was “no evidence” that the US was directly involved in the coup.[32] This view has been contradicted by several academics, such as Peter Winn, who writes that the role of the CIA was crucial to the consolidation of power after the coup; the CIA helped fabricate a conspiracy against the Allende government, which Pinochet was then portrayed as preventing. He stated that the coup itself was possible only through a three-year covert operation mounted by the United States. He also points out that the US imposed an “invisible blockade” that was designed to disrupt the economy under Allende, and contributed to the destabilization of the regime.[6] Author Peter Kornbluh argues in his book The Pinochet File[33] that the US was extensively involved and actively “fomented”[33] the 1973 coup. Authors Tim Weiner, in his book, Legacy of Ashes,[34] and Christopher Hitchens, in his book, The Trial of Henry Kissinger [35] similarly argue the case that US covert actions actively destabilized Allende’s government and set the stage for the 1973 coup.
The U.S. provided material support to the military government after the coup, although criticizing it in public. A document released by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 2000, titled “CIA Activities in Chile”, revealed that the CIA actively supported the military junta after the overthrow of Allende, and that it made many of Pinochet’s officers into paid contacts of the CIA or U.S. military, even though some were known to be involved in human rights abuses.[36] The CIA also maintained contacts in the Chilean DINA intelligence service. DINA led the multinational campaign known as Operation Condor, which amongst other activities carried out assassinations of prominent politicians in various Latin American countries, in Washington, D.C., and in Europe, and kidnapped, tortured and executed activists holding left-wing views, which culminated in the deaths of roughly 60,000 people.[37][38] The United States provided key organizational, financial and technical assistance to the operation.[39][40][41] CIA contact with DINA head Manuel Contreras was established in 1974 soon after the coup, during the Junta period prior to official transfer of Presidential powers to Pinochet; in 1975, the CIA reviewed a warning that keeping Contreras as an asset might threaten human rights in the region. The CIA chose to keep him as an asset, and at one point even paid him. In addition to the CIA’s maintaining of assets in DINA beginning soon after the coup, several CIA assets, such as CORU Cuban exile militants Orlando Bosch and Guillermo Novo, collaborated in DINA operations under the Condor Plan in the early years of Pinochet’s presidency.
Military junta[edit]
A military junta was established immediately following the coup, made up of General Pinochet representing the Army, Admiral José Toribio Merino representing the Navy, General Gustavo Leigh representing the Air Force, and General César Mendoza representing the Carabineros (national police). As established, the junta exercised both executive and legislative functions of the government, suspended the Constitution and the Congress, imposed strict censorship and curfew, banned all parties and halted all political activities. This military junta held the executive role until 17 December 1974, after which it remained strictly as a legislative body, the executive powers being transferred to Pinochet with the title of President.
Presidency[edit]
The junta members originally planned that the presidency would be held for a year by the commanders-in-chief of each of the four military branches in turn. However, Pinochet soon consolidated his control, first retaining sole chairmanship of the military junta, and then proclaiming himself “Supreme Chief of the Nation” (de facto provisional president) on 27 June 1974.[42] He officially changed his title to “President” on 17 December 1974. General Leigh, head of the Air Force, became increasingly opposed to Pinochet’s policies and was forced into retirement on 24 July 1978, after contradicting Pinochet on that year’s plebiscite (officially called Consulta Nacional, or National Consultation, in response to a UN resolution condemning Pinochet’s government). He was replaced by General Fernando Matthei.
Pinochet organized a plebiscite on 11 September 1980 to ratify a new constitution, replacing the 1925 Constitution drafted during Arturo Alessandri‘s presidency. The new Constitution, partly drafted by Jaime Guzmán, a close adviser to Pinochet who later founded the right-wing party Independent Democratic Union (UDI), gave a lot of power to the President of the Republic—Pinochet. It created some new institutions, such as the Constitutional Tribunal and the controversial National Security Council (COSENA). It also prescribed an 8-year presidential period, and a single-candidate presidential referendum in 1988, where a candidate nominated by the Junta would be approved or rejected for another 8-year period. The new constitution was approved by a margin of 67.04% to 30.19% according to official figures;[43] the opposition, headed by ex-president Eduardo Frei Montalva (who had supported Pinochet’s coup), denounced extensive irregularities such as the lack of an electoral register, which facilitated multiple voting, and said that the total number of votes reported to have been cast was very much larger than would be expected from the size of the electorate and turnout in previous elections. Interviews after Pinochet’s departure with people involved with the referendum confirmed that fraud had, indeed, been widespread.[44] The Constitution was promulgated on 21 October 1980, taking effect on 11 March 1981. Pinochet was replaced as President of the Junta that day by Admiral Merino.
In a massive operation spearheaded by Chilean Army para-commandos, some 2,000 security forces troops[45] were deployed in the mountains of Neltume from June to November 1981,[46] where they destroyed two MIR bases, seizing large caches of munitions and killing a number of guerrillas.
In a 1985 report, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights stated that it hoped that “the case now under way will lead to the identification and punishment of the persons responsible for the execution of so culpable an act.”[47] Eventually, six members of the police secret service were given life sentences.
According to a book by Ozren Agnic Krstulovic, weapons including C-4 plastic explosives, RPG-7 and M72 LAW rocket launchers, as well as more than 3,000 M-16 rifles, were smuggled into the country by opponents of the government.[48]
In September weapons from the same source were used in an unsuccessful assassination attempt against Pinochet by the FPMR. His military bodyguard was taken by surprise, and five members were killed. Pinochet’s bulletproof Mercedes Benz vehicle was struck by a rocket, but it failed to explode and Pinochet suffered only minor injuries.[49]
Suppression of opposition[edit]
“ | He shut down parliament, suffocated political life, banned trade unions, and made Chile his sultanate. His government disappeared 3,000 opponents, arrested 30,000 (torturing thousands of them) … Pinochet’s name will forever be linked to the Desaparecidos, the Caravan of Death, and the institutionalized torture that took place in the Villa Grimaldi complex. | ” |
— Thor Halvorssen, president of the Human Rights Foundation, National Review[50] |
Almost immediately after the military’s seizure of power, the junta banned all the leftist parties that had constituted Allende’s UP coalition.[51] All other parties were placed in “indefinite recess” and were later banned outright. The government’s violence was directed not only against dissidents but also against their families and other civilians.[51]
The Rettig Report concluded 2,279 persons who disappeared during the military government were killed for political reasons or as a result of political violence. According to the later Valech Report approximately 31,947 were tortured and 1,312 exiled. The exiles were chased all over the world by the intelligence agencies. In Latin America, this was made in the frame of Operation Condor, a cooperation plan between the various intelligence agencies of South American countries, assisted by a United States CIA communication base in Panama. Pinochet believed these operations were necessary in order to “save the country from communism”.[52] In 2011 the commission identified an additional 9,800 victims of political repression during Pinochet’s rule, increasing the total number of victims to approximately 40,018, including 3,065 killed.[53]
Some political scientists have ascribed the relative bloodiness of the coup to the stability of the existing democratic system, which required extreme action to overturn. Some of the most infamous cases of human rights violation occurred during the early period: in October 1973, at least 70 people were killed throughout the country by the Caravan of Death. Charles Horman and Frank Teruggi, both US journalists, “disappeared“,[54] as did Víctor Olea Alegría, a member of the Socialist Party, and many others, in 1973. British priest Michael Woodward, who vanished within 10 days of the coup, was tortured and beaten to death aboard the Chilean naval ship, Esmeralda (BE-43).[55][56]
Many other important officials of Allende’s government were tracked down by the DINA in the frame of Operation Condor. General Carlos Prats, Pinochet’s predecessor and army commander under Allende, who had resigned rather than support the moves against Allende’s government, was assassinated in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1974. A year later, the murder of 119 opponents abroad was disguised as an internal conflict, the DINA setting up a propaganda campaign to support this idea (Operation Colombo), a campaign publicised by the leading newspaper in Chile, El Mercurio.
Other victims of Condor included, among hundreds of less famous persons, Juan José Torres, the former President of Bolivia, assassinated in Buenos Aires on 2 June 1976; Carmelo Soria, a UN diplomat working for the CEPAL, assassinated in July 1976; Orlando Letelier, a former Chilean ambassador to the United States and minister in Allende’s cabinet, assassinated after his release from internment and exile in Washington, D.C. by a car bomb on 21 September 1976. Documents confirm that Pinochet directly ordered the assassination of Letelier.[57] This led to strained relations with the US and to the extradition of Michael Townley, a US citizen who worked for the DINA and had organized Letelier’s assassination. Other targeted victims, who escaped assassination, included Christian-Democrat Bernardo Leighton, who escaped an assassination attempt in Rome in 1975 by the Italian terrorist Stefano delle Chiaie; Carlos Altamirano, the leader of the Chilean Socialist Party, targeted for murder in 1975 by Pinochet, along with Volodia Teitelboim, member of the Communist Party; Pascal Allende, the nephew of Salvador Allende and president of the MIR, who escaped an assassination attempt in Costa Rica in March 1976; US Congressman Edward Koch, who became aware in 2001 of relations between death threats and his denunciation of Operation Condor, etc. Furthermore, according to current investigations, Eduardo Frei Montalva, the Christian Democrat President of Chile from 1964 to 1970, may have been poisoned in 1982 by toxin produced by DINA biochemist Eugenio Berrios.[58]
Protests continued, however, during the 1980s, leading to several scandals. In March 1985, the murder of three Communist Party members led to the resignation of César Mendoza, head of the Carabineros and member of the juntasince its formation. During a 1986 protest against Pinochet, 21-year-old American photographer Rodrigo Rojas DeNegriand 18-year-old student Carmen Gloria Quintana were burnt alive, with only Carmen surviving.
In August 1989, Marcelo Barrios Andres, a 21-year-old member of the FPMR (the armed wing of the PCC, created in 1983, which had attempted to assassinate Pinochet on 7 September 1986), was assassinated by a group of military personnel who were supposed to arrest him on orders of Valparaíso’s public prosecutor. However, they simply executed him; this case was included in the Rettig Report.[59] Among the killed and disappeared during the military junta were 440 MIR guerrillas.[60] In December 2015, three former DINA agents were sentenced to ten years in prison for the murder of a 29 year old theology student and activist, German Rodriguez Cortes, in 1978.[61] That same month 62 year old Guillermo Reyes Rammsy, a former Chilean soldier during the Pinochet years, was arrested and charged with murder for boasting of participating in 18 executions during a live phone-in to the Chilean radio show “Chacotero Sentimental.”[62]
On June 2, 2017, Chilean judge Hernan Cristoso sentenced 106 former Chilean intelligence officials to between 541 days and 20 years in prison for their role in the kidnapping and murder of 16 left-wing activists in 1974 and 1975.[63]
Economic policy[edit]
“ | The first country in the world to make that momentous break with the past—away from socialism and extreme state capitalism toward more market-oriented structures and policies—was not Deng Xiaoping’s China or Margaret Thatcher’s Britain in the late 1970s, Ronald Reagan’s United States in 1981, or any other country in Latin America or elsewhere. It was Pinochet’s Chile in 1975. | ” |
— Robert Packenham & William Ratliff Hoover Institution[64] |
In 1973, the Chilean economy was deeply hurt for several reasons, including the expropriation of 600 businesses by the Allende government, a tiered exchange rate that distorted markets, protectionism, and the economic sanctions imposed by the Nixon administration,[65] inflation was 1000%, the country had no foreign reserves, and GDP was falling rapidly.[66] By mid-1975, the government set forth an economic policy of free-market reforms that attempted to stop inflation and collapse. Pinochet declared that he wanted “to make Chile not a nation of proletarians, but a nation of proprietors.”[67] To formulate the economic rescue, the government relied on the so-called Chicago Boys and a text called El ladrillo.
Chile’s nationalized main copper mines remained in government hands, with the 1980 Constitution later declaring them “inalienable”.[68] In 1976, Codelcowas established to exploit them but new mineral deposits were opened to private investment. Capitalist involvement was increased, the Chilean pension system and healthcare and education were privatized.
Wages decreased by 8%.[69] Family allowances in 1989 were 28% of what they had been in 1970 and the budgets for education, health and housing had dropped by over 20% on average[69] The junta relied on the middle class, the oligarchy, foreign corporations, and foreign loans to maintain itself.[70] Businesses recovered most of their lost industrial and agricultural holdings, for the junta returned properties to original owners who had lost them during expropriations, and sold other industries expropriated by Allende’s Popular Unity government to private buyers. This period saw the expansion of business and widespread speculation.
Economic history of Chile |
---|
![]() |
Financial conglomerates became major beneficiaries of the liberalized economy and the flood of foreign bank loans. Large foreign banks reinstated the credit cycle, as the Junta saw that the basic state obligations, such as resuming payment of principal and interest installments, were honored. International lending organizations such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Inter-American Development Bank lent vast sums anew.[69] Many foreign multinational corporations such as International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT), Dow Chemical, and Firestone, all expropriated by Allende, returned to Chile.[69]Pinochet’s policies eventually led to substantial GDP growth, in contrast to the negative growth seen in the early years of his administration. Foreign debt also grew substantially under Pinochet, rising 300% between 1974 and 1988.
His government implemented an economic model that had three main objectives: economic liberalization, privatization of state owned companies, and stabilization of inflation. In 1985, the government started with a second round of privatization, it revised previously introduced tariff increases and gave a greater supervisory role for the Central Bank. Pinochet’s market liberalizations have continued after his death, led by Patricio Aylwin.[20]
Critics argue the neoliberal economic policies of the Pinochet regime resulted in widening inequality and deepening poverty as they negatively impacted the wages, benefits and working conditions of Chile’s working class.[71][72] According to Chilean economist Alejandro Foxley, by the end of Pinochet’s reign around 44% of Chilean families were living below the poverty line.[73] According to The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein, by the late 1980s the economy had stabilized and was growing, but around 45% of the population had fallen into poverty while the wealthiest 10% saw their incomes rise by 83%.[74]
1988 referendum and transition to democracy[edit]
According to the transitional provisions of the 1980 Constitution, a referendum was scheduled for 5 October 1988, to vote on a new eight-year presidential term for Pinochet. Confronted with increasing opposition, notably at the international level, Pinochet legalized political parties in 1987 and called for a vote to determine whether or not he would remain in power until 1997. If the “YES” won, Pinochet would have to implement the dispositions of the 1980 Constitution, mainly the call for general elections, while he would himself remain in power as President. If the “NO” won, Pinochet would remain President for another year, and a joint Presidential and Parliamentary election would be scheduled.
Another reason of Pinochet’s decision to call for elections was the April 1987 visit of Pope John Paul II to Chile. According to the US Catholic author George Weigel, he held a meeting with Pinochet during which they discussed a return to democracy. John Paul II allegedly pushed Pinochet to accept a democratic opening of his government, and even called for his resignation.[75]
Political advertising was legalized on 5 September 1987, as a necessary element for the campaign for the “NO” to the referendum, which countered the official campaign, which presaged a return to a Popular Unity government in case of a defeat of Pinochet. The Opposition, gathered into the Concertación de Partidos por el NO (“Coalition of Parties for NO”), organized a colorful and cheerful campaign under the slogan La alegría ya viene (“Joy is coming”). It was formed by the Christian Democracy, the Socialist Party and the Radical Party, gathered in the Alianza Democrática (Democratic Alliance). In 1988, several more parties, including the Humanist Party, the Ecologist Party, the Social Democrats, and several Socialist Party splinter groups added their support.
On 5 October 1988, the “NO” option won with 55.99%[76] of the votes, against 44.01% of “YES” votes. Pinochet accepted the result and the ensuing Constitutional process led to presidential and legislative elections the following year.
The Coalition changed its name to Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia (Coalition of Parties for Democracy) and put forward Patricio Aylwin, a Christian Democrat who had opposed Allende, as presidential candidate, and also proposed a list of candidates for the parliamentary elections. The opposition and the Pinochet government made several negotiations to amend the Constitution and agreed to 54 modifications. These amendments changed the way the Constitution would be modified in the future, added restrictions to state of emergency dispositions, the affirmation of political pluralism, and enhanced constitutional rights as well as the democratic principle and participation to political life. In July 1989, a referendum on the proposed changes took place, supported by all the parties except the right-wing Southern Party and the instrumental Chilean Socialist Party (created by the dictatorship to confuse voters).[77] The Constitutional changes were approved by 91.25% of the voters.
Thereafter, Aylwin won the December 1989 presidential election with 55% of the votes,[76] against less than 30% for the right-wing candidate, Hernán Büchi, who had been Pinochet’s Minister of Finances since 1985 (there was also a third-party candidate, Francisco Javier Errázuriz, a wealthy aristocrat representing the extreme economic right, who garnered the remaining 15%[76]). Pinochet thus left the presidency on 11 March 1990 and transferred power to the new democratically elected president.
The Concertación also won the majority of votes for the Parliament. However, due to the “binomial” representation system included in the constitution, the elected senators did not achieve a complete majority in Parliament, a situation that would last for over 15 years. This forced them to negotiate all law projects with the Alliance for Chile (originally called “Democracy and Progress” and then “Union for Chile”), a center-right coalition involving the Unión Demócrata Independiente (UDI) and Renovación Nacional (RN), parties composed mainly of Pinochet’s supporters.
Due to the transitional provisions of the constitution, Pinochet remained as Commander-in-Chief of the Army until March 1998. He was then sworn in as a senator-for-life, a privilege granted by the 1980 constitution to former presidents with at least six years in office. His senatorship and consequent immunity from prosecution protected him from legal action. These were possible in Chile only after Pinochet was arrested in 1998 in the United Kingdom, on an extradition request issued by Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón, allegations of abuses had been made numerous times before his arrest, but never acted upon.[78] The extradition attempt was dramatised in the 2006 BBC television docudrama Pinochet in Suburbia, with Pinochet played by Derek Jacobi. Shortly before giving the power, Pinochet prohibited all forms of abortion, previously authorized in case of rape or risk to the life of the mother.[79]
Relationship with the United Kingdom[edit]
Chile was officially neutral during the Falklands War, but Chile’s Westinghouse long range radar that was deployed in the south of the country gave the British task force early warning of Argentinian air attacks. This allowed British ships and troops in the war zone to take defensive action.[80] Margaret Thatcher, the British prime minister at the time of the war, said that the day the radar was taken out of service for overdue maintenance was the day Argentinian fighter-bombers bombed the troopships Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram, leaving 53 dead and many injured. According to Chilean Junta member and former Air Force commander, General Fernando Matthei, Chilean support included military intelligence gathering, radar surveillance, allowing British aircraft to operate with Chilean colours, and facilitating the safe return of British special forces, among other forms of assistance.[81]
In April and May 1982, a squadron of mothballed British Hawker Hunter fighter-bombers departed for Chile, arriving on 22 May and allowing the Chilean Air Force to reform the No. 9 “Las Panteras Negras” Squadron. A further consignment of three frontier surveillance and shipping reconnaissance Canberras left for Chile in October. Some authors have speculated that Argentina might have won the war had the military felt able to employ the elite VIth and VIIIth Mountain Brigades, which remained sitting in the Andes guarding against possible Chilean incursions.[82] Pinochet subsequently visited the UK on more than one occasion.[83] Pinochet’s controversial relationship with Thatcher led Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair to mock Thatcher’s Conservatives as “the party of Pinochet” in 1999.[84]
Ideology and public image[edit]
Pinochet himself expressed his project in government as a national rebirth inspired in Diego Portales, a figure of the early republic:[85]
“ | …[democracy] will be born again purified from the vices and bad habits that ended up destroying our institutions… …we are inspired in the Portalian spirit which has fused together the nation… | ” |
— Augusto Pinochet, 11 October 1973. |
The lawyer Jaime Guzmán participated in the design of important speeches of Pinochet, and provided frequent political and doctrinal advice and consultancy.[86]
Jacobo Timerman has called the Chilean army under Pinochet “the last Prussian army in the world”,[87] suggesting a pre-Fascist origin to the model of Pinochet’s military government.
Historian Alfredo Jocelyn-Holt has referred to Pinochet’s figure as “totemic” and added that it is a scapegoat that attracts “all hate”.[88] Gabriel Salazar, also a historian, has lamented the lack of an international condemnation of Pinochet in court, since, according to Salazar, that would have damaged his image “irreparably” and that of the judicial system of Chile[for the good] too.[88]
According to Pinochet, who was aware of his ancestry, he was taught the French language by an uncle. He would then have forgotten most of it. Pinochet admired Napoleon as the greatest among French and had a framed picture of him. Another French ruler he admired was Louis XIV.[89][B]
Accusations of fascism[edit]
Image showing Pinochet in an event with background imagery comparing the year of Chilean independence, 1810, with 1973, the year of the coup d’état that brought Pinochet to power.
Pinochet and his government have been characterised as fascist.[91] For example, journalist and author Samuel Chavkin,[92] in his book Storm Over Chile: The Junta Under Siege, repeatedly characterizes both Pinochet himself and the military dictatorship as fascist.[93]
However, he and his government are generally excluded from academic typologies of fascism.[94][95][96][97] Roger Griffin included Pinochet in a group of pseudo-populist despots distinct from fascism and including the likes of Saddam Hussein, Suharto, and Ferdinand Marcos. He argues that such regimes may be considered populist ultra-nationalism but lack the rhetoric of national rebirth, or palingenesis, necessary to make them conform to the model of palingenetic ultranationalism.[94] Robert Paxton meanwhile compared Pinochet’s regime to that of Mobutu Sese Seko in the former Zaire (now Democratic Republic of the Congo), arguing that both were merely client states that lacked popular acclaim and the ability to expand. He further argued that had Pinochet attempted to build true fascism, the regime would likely have been toppled or at least been forced to alter its relationship to the United States.[95] Anna Cento Bull also excluded Pinochet from fascism, although she has argued that his regime belongs to a strand of Cold War anti-communism that was happy to accommodate neo-fascist elements within its activity.[96]
World Fascism: a Historical Encyclopedia notes that “Although he was authoritarian and ruled dictatorially, Pinochet’s support of neoliberal economic policies and his unwillingness to support national businesses distinguished him from classical fascists.”[98]
Historian Gabriel Salazar stated that Pinochet’s establishment cult of personality around him was a fascist tactic:
“ | It is notable that in all the declarations of Pinochet’s men, nobody has mentioned the creators of the new Chilean society and state, I haven’t heard anybody mention Jaime Guzmán, Carlos Cáceres, Hernán Büchi, Sergio de Castro. There is no mention of the true brains, or that the whole of the armed forces were involved in this, in dirty and symbolic tasks. Everything is embodied in Pinochet, it’s very curious that figures of the stature of Büchi are immolated before the figure of Pinochet, in what is to me a fascist rite, give everything to the Führer, “I did it, but ultimately it was him”.[88] | ” |
Intellectual life and academic work[edit]
Pinochet was publicly known as a man with a lack of culture. This image was reinforced by the fact that he also portrayed himself as a common man with simple ideas. He was also known for being reserved, sharing little about his opinions or feelings.[99] Before wresting power from Allende, Pinochet had written two books, Geopolítica (1968) and Campaña de Tarapacá (1972), which established him as a major figure in Chile’s military literature.[99] In Geopolítica Pinochet plagiarized his mentor general Gregorio Rodríguez Tascón by using paragraphs from a 1949 conference presentation of Rodríguez without attributing them to him.[100][101] Rodríguez had previously lectured Pinochet and René Schneider and Carlos Prats in geography and geopolitics. In contrast to the two latter Pinochet was not an outstanding student but his persistence and interest in geopolitics made Rodríguez assume the role as his academic mentor.[101] Rodríguez granted Pinochet a slot as assistant lecturer in geopolitics and in geography. According to Rodríguez Pinochet would have been particularly impressed by his lectures on The Art of War.[101] Pinochet would later succeed Rodríguez in the geopolitics and geography chair.[101]
Investigative journalist Juan Cristóbal Peña has put forward the thesis that Pinochet felt intellectual envy of Carlos Pratsand that the latter’s assassination in 1974 was a relief for Pinochet.[100]
During his lifetime, Pinochet amassed more than 55,000 books in his private library, worth an estimated 2,840,000 US dollars (2006–07). The extent of his library was only known to the public after a police inspection in January 2006.[99]Pinochet bought books at several small bookshops in the old centre of Santiago and was later supplied with books from abroad by military attachés who bought texts Pinochet was searching after.[102][103] As ruler of Chile he used discretionary funds for these purchases.[103] The library included many rare books including a first edition (1646) Historica relacion del Reyno de Chile and an original letter of Bernardo O’Higgins. A significant part of the books and documents of the library of José Manuel Balmaceda was found in Pinochet’s library in 2006.[99] Pinochet’s library contained almost no poetry or fiction works.[103]
Nicknames[edit]
Supporters sometimes refer to Pinochet as mi general (the military salutation for a general) while opponents call him pinocho (Spanish for “Pinocchio“, from the children’s story).[104] A common nickname used by both younger generations is el tata (Chilean Spanish equivalent of “the grandpa”). Since the Riggs Bank scandal he has been referred to sarcastically as Daniel Lopez, one of the fake identities he used to deposit money in the bank.[105]
Post-dictatorship life[edit]
Arrest and court cases in Britain[edit]
The case was a watershed event in judicial history, as it was the first time that a former government head was arrested on the principle of universal jurisdiction.[106]
After having been placed under house arrest in Britain in October 1998 and initiating a judicial and public relations battle, the latter run by Thatcherite political operative Patrick Robertson,[107] he was eventually released in March 2000 on medical grounds by the Home Secretary Jack Straw without facing trial. Straw had overruled a House of Lords decision to extradite Pinochet to face trial in Spain.[108]
Return to Chile[edit]
Pinochet returned to Chile on 3 March 2000. His first act when landing in Santiago’s airport was to triumphantly get up from his wheelchair to the acclaim of his supporters.[109][110][111] He was first greeted by his successor as head of the Chilean armed forces, General Ricardo Izurieta.[109] President-elect Ricardo Lagos said the retired general’s televised arrival had damaged the image of Chile, while thousands demonstrated against him.[112]
In March 2000 Congress approved a constitutional amendment creating the status of “ex-president,” which granted its holder immunity from prosecution and a financial allowance; this replaced Pinochet’s senatorship-for-life. 111 legislators voted for, and 29 against.[113]
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of judge Juan Guzmán’s request on August 2000, and Pinochet was indicted on 1 December 2000 for the kidnapping of 75 opponents in the Caravan of Death case.[114] Guzmán advanced the charge of kidnapping as the 75 were officially “disappeared“: even though they were all most likely dead, the absence of their corpses made any charge of “homicide” difficult.
However, in July 2002, the Supreme Court dismissed Pinochet’s indictment in the various human rights abuse cases, for medical reasons (vascular dementia). The debate concerned Pinochet’s mental faculties, his legal team claiming that he was senile and could not remember, while others (including several physicians) claimed that he was only affected physically but retained all control of his faculties. The same year, the prosecuting attorney Hugo Guttierez, in charge of the Caravan of Death case, declared, “Our country has the degree of justice that the political transition permits us to have.”[115]
Pinochet resigned from his senatorial seat shortly after the Supreme Court’s July 2002 ruling. In May 2004, the Supreme Court overturned its precedent decision, and ruled that he was capable of standing trial. In arguing their case, the prosecution presented a recent TV interview Pinochet had given for a Miami-based television network, which raised doubts about his alleged mental incapacity. In December 2004 he was charged with several crimes, including the 1974 assassination of General Prats and the Operation Colombo case in which 119 died, and was again placed under house arrest. He suffered a stroke on 18 December 2004.[116] Questioned by his judges in order to know if, as President, he was the direct head of DINA, he answered: “I don’t remember, but it’s not true. And if it were true, I don’t remember.”[117]
In January 2005 the Chilean Army accepted institutional responsibility for past human rights abuses.[118] In 2006 Pinochet was indicted for kidnappings and torture at the Villa Grimaldi detention center by judge Alejandro Madrid (Guzmán’s successor),[119] as well as for the 1995 assassination of the DINA biochemist Eugenio Berrios, himself involved in the Letelier case.[120] Berrios, who had worked with Michael Townley, had produced sarin gas, anthrax and botulism in the Bacteriological War Army Laboratory for Pinochet; these materials were used against political opponents. The DINA biochemist was also alleged to have created black cocaine, which Pinochet then sold in Europe and the United States.[121]The money for the drug trade was allegedly deposited into Pinochet’s bank accounts.[122] Pinochet’s son Marco Antonio, who had been accused of participating in the drug trade, in 2006 denied claims of drug trafficking in his father’s administration and said that he would sue Manuel Contreras, who had said that Pinochet sold cocaine.[123]
On 25 November 2006 Pinochet marked his 91st birthday by having his wife read a statement he had written to admirers present for his birthday: “I assume the political responsibility for all that has been done.”[124] Two days later, he was again sentenced to house arrest for the kidnapping and murder of two bodyguards of Salvador Allende who were arrested the day of the 1973 coup and executed by firing squad during the Caravan of Death.[125][126]
However, Pinochet died a few days later, on 10 December 2006, without having been convicted of any of the crimes of which he was accused.
Scandals: secret bank accounts, tax evasion, and arms deal[edit]
In 2004, a United States Senate money laundering investigation led by Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and Norm Coleman (R-MN)—ordered in the wake of the 11 September 2001 attacks—uncovered a network of over 125 securities and bank accounts at Riggs Bank and other U.S. financial institutions used by Pinochet and his associates for twenty-five years to secretly move millions of dollars.[127] Though the subcommittee was charged only with investigating compliance of financial institutions under the USA PATRIOT Act, and not the Pinochet regime, Senator Coleman noted:
This is a sad, sordid tale of money laundering involving Pinochet accounts at multiple financial institutions using alias names, offshore accounts, and close associates. As a former General and President of Chile, Pinochet was a well-known human rights violator and violent dictator.[127]
Over several months in 2005, Chilean judge Sergio Muñoz indicted Augusto Pinochet’s wife, Lucia Hiriart; four of his children – Marco Antonio, Jacqueline, Veronica and Lucia Pinochet; his personal secretary, Monica Ananias; and his former aide Oscar Aitken on tax evasion and falsification charges stemming from the Riggs Bank investigation. In January 2006, daughter Lucia Pinochet was detained at Washington DC-Dulles airport and subsequently deported while attempting to evade the tax charges in Chile.[128] In January 2007, the Santiago Court of Appeals revoked most of the indictment from Judge Carlos Cerda against the Pinochet family.[129] But Pinochet’s five children, his wife and 17 other persons (including two generals, one of his former lawyer and former secretary) were arrested in October 2007 on charges of embezzlementand use of false passports. They are accused of having illegally transferred $27m (£13.2m) to foreign bank accounts during Pinochet’s rule.[130][131]
In September 2005, a joint investigation by The Guardian and La Tercera revealed that the British arms firm BAE Systemshad been identified as paying more than £1m to Pinochet, through a front company in the British Virgin Islands, which BAE has used to channel commission on arms deals.[132] The payments began in 1997 and lasted until 2004.[132][133]
Furthermore, in 2007, fifteen years of investigation led to the conclusion that the 1992 assassination of DINA Colonel Gerardo Huber was most probably related to various illegal arms traffic carried out, after Pinochet’s resignation from power, by military circles very close to himself.[134] Huber had been assassinated a short time before he was due to testifyin the case concerning the 1991 illegal export of weapons to Croatian army. The deal involved 370 tons of weapons, sold to Croatia by Chile on 7 December 1991, when the former country was under a United Nations‘ embargo because of the support for Croatia war in Yugoslavia.[135] In January 1992, the judge Hernán Correa de la Cerda wanted to hear Gerardo Huber in this case, but the latter may have been silenced to avoid implicating Pinochet in this new case[134][136][137]—although the latter was not anymore President, he remained at the time Commander-in-Chief of the Army. Pinochet was at the center of this illegal arms trade, receiving money through various offshores and front companies, including the Banco Coutts International in Miami.[138]
Pinochet was stripped of his parliamentary immunity in August 2000 by the Supreme Court, and indicted by judge Juan Guzmán Tapia. Guzmán had ordered in 1999 the arrest of five militarists, including General Pedro Espinoza Bravo of the DINA, for their role in the Caravan of Death following the coup on 11 September. Arguing that the bodies of the “disappeared” were still missing, he made jurisprudence, which had as effect to lift any prescription on the crimes committed by the military. Pinochet’s trial continued until his death on 10 December 2006, with an alternation of indictments for specific cases, lifting of immunities by the Supreme Court or to the contrary immunity from prosecution, with his health a main argument for, or against, his prosecution.
The Supreme Court affirmed, in March 2005, Pinochet’s immunity concerning the 1974 assassination of General Carlos Prats in Buenos Aires, which had taken place in the frame of Operation Condor. However, he was deemed fit to stand trial for Operation Colombo, during which 119 political opponents were “disappeared” in Argentina. The Chilean justice also lifted his immunity on the Villa Grimaldi case, a detention and torture center in the outskirts of Santiago. Pinochet, who still benefited from a reputation of righteousness from his supporters, lost legitimacy when he was put under house arrest on tax fraud and passport forgery, following the publication by the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of a report concerning the Riggs Bank in July 2004. The report was a consequence of investigations on financial funding of the 11 September 2001 attacks in the US. The bank controlled between US$4 million and $8 million of Pinochet’s assets, who lived in Santiago in a modest house, dissimulating his wealth. According to the report, Riggs participated in money laundering for Pinochet, setting up offshore shell corporations (referring to Pinochet as only “a former public official”), and hiding his accounts from regulatory agencies. Related to Pinochet’s and his family secret bank accounts in United States and in Caribbean islands, this tax fraud filing for an amount of 27 million dollars shocked the conservative sectors who still supported him. Ninety percent of these funds would have been raised between 1990 and 1998, when Pinochet was chief of the Chilean armies, and would essentially have come from weapons traffic (when purchasing French ‘Mirage’ air-fighters in 1994, Dutch ‘Léopard’ tanks, Swiss ‘Mowag’ tanks or by illegal sales of weapons to Croatia, during the Balkans war.) His wife, Lucía Hiriart, and his son, Marco Antonio Pinochet, were also sued for complicity. For the fourth time in seven years, Pinochet was indicted by the Chilean justice.[139]
Death[edit]
Pinochet suffered a heart attack on the morning of 3 December 2006, and subsequently the same day he was given the last rites. On 4 December 2006, the Chilean Court of Appeals ordered the suspension of his house arrest. On 10 December 2006 at 13:30 local time (16:30 UTC) he was taken to the intensive care unit.[140] He died of congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema,[141] surrounded by family members, at the Military Hospital at 14:15 local time (17:15 UTC).[142]
Massive spontaneous street demonstrations broke out throughout the country upon the news of his death. In Santiago, opponents celebrated his death in Alameda Avenue, while supporters grieved outside the Military Hospital. Pinochet’s remains lay in repose on 11 December 2006 at the Military Academy in Las Condes. During this ceremony, Francisco Cuadrado Prats—the grandson of Carlos Prats (a former Commander-in-Chief of the Army in the Allende government who was murdered by Pinochet’s secret police)—spat on the coffin, and was quickly surrounded by supporters of Pinochet, who kicked and insulted him. Pinochet’s funeral took place the following day at the same venue before a gathering of 60,000 supporters.[143]
In a government decision, he was not granted a state funeral (an honor normally bestowed upon past presidents of Chile) but a military funeral as former commander-in-chief of the Army appointed by Allende. The government also refused to declare an official national day of mourning, but it did authorize flags at military barracks to be flown at half staff, and for the Chilean flag to be draped on Pinochet’s coffin. Socialist President Michelle Bachelet, whose father Alberto was temporarily imprisoned and tortured after the 1973 coup and died shortly afterwards from heart complications, said that it would be “a violation of [her] conscience” to attend a state funeral for Pinochet.[144] The only government authority present at the public funeral was the Defense Minister, Vivianne Blanlot.
In Spain, supporters of late dictator Francisco Franco paid homage to Pinochet. Antonio Tejero, who led the failed coup of 1981, attended a memorial service in Madrid.[145] Pinochet’s body was cremated in Parque del Mar Cemetery, Concón on 12 December 2006, on his request to “avoid vandalism of his tomb,” according to his son Marco Antonio.[146][C] His ashes were delivered to his family later that day, and are deposited in Los Boldos, Santo Domingo, Valparaiso, Chile; one of his personal residences. The armed forces refused to allow his ashes to be deposited on military property.[147]
Human rights violations[edit]
Pinochet’s regime was responsible for various human rights abuses during its reign, including murder and torture of political opponents. According to a government commission report that included testimony from more than 30,000 people, Pinochet’s government killed at least 3,197 people and tortured about 29,000. Two-thirds of the cases listed in the report happened in 1973.[148]
Professor Clive Foss, in The Tyrants: 2500 Years of Absolute Power and Corruption (Quercus Publishing 2006), estimates that 1,500–2,000 Chileans were killed or “disappeared” during the Pinochet regime. In October 1979, the New York Timesreported that Amnesty International had documented the disappearance of approximately 1,500 Chileans since 1973.[149]Among the killed and disappeared during the military regime were at least 663 Marxist MIR guerrillas.[150] The Manuel Rodríguez Patriotic Front, however, has stated that only 49 FPMR guerrillas were killed but hundreds detained and tortured.[151] According to a study in Latin American Perspectives,[152] at least 200,000 Chileans (about 2% of Chile’s 1973 population) were forced to go into exile. Additionally, hundreds of thousands left the country in the wake of the economic crises that followed the military coup during the 1970s and 1980s.[152] Some of the key individuals who fled because of political persecution were followed in their exile by the DINA secret police, in the framework of Operation Condor, which linked South American military dictatorships together against political opponents.
According to Peter Kornbluh in The Pinochet File, “routine sadism was taken to extremes” in the prison camps. The rape of women was common, including sexual torture such as the insertion of rats into genitals and “unnatural acts involving dogs.” Detainees were forcibly immersed in vats of urine and excrement. Beatings with gun butts, fists and chains were routine; one technique known as “the telephone” involved the torturer slamming “his open hands hard and rhythmically against the ears of the victim,” leaving the person deaf. At Villa Grimaldi, prisoners were dragged into the parking lot and had the bones in their legs crushed as they were run over with trucks. Some died from torture; prisoners were beaten with chains and left to die from internal injuries.[153] Following abuse and execution, corpses were interred in secret graves, dropped into rivers or the ocean, or just dumped on urban streets in the night. The body of the renowned Chilean singer, theatre director and academic Víctor Jara was found in a dirty canal “with his hands and face extremely disfigured” and with “forty-four bullet holes.”[154]
The practice of murdering political opponents via “death flights“, employed by the juntas of Argentina and Chile, has been the subject of numerous alt-right internet memes, with the suggestion that progressive political enemies be given “free helicopter rides.”[155]
Notes[edit]
- Jump up^ Evidence suggests Chileans, possibly including Pinochet, pronounced his name both ways. Recordings with the first and most common pronunciation can be found here: “Augusto Pinochet”. Forvo. 27 August 2014. Retrieved 27 August 2014..
- Jump up^ When the admiration of Louis XIV surfaced in a 1986 interview it sparkled APSI to publish a graphic satire made by Guillowhich showed Pinochet dressed as Louis XIV on its front page. The magazine was subsequently censored out of the newsagent’s shop and its staff imprisoned.[90]
- Jump up^ See also: corpse of Pedro Eugenio Aramburu, corpse of Evita and Hands of Perón.
See also[edit]
Sorry but a couple of these rounds are some that I never heard of before! (6.5-284 Norma or the .280 Ackley Improved?)
But he does have a few good ideas there.
Grumpy
America’s Top 10 Big Game Cartridges
by 0
| September 19th, 2016I hate to begin an article by apologizing. So I won’t. If you’re of sensitive nature and protective of your favorite cartridge, now may be the time to skip to the next article.
The following is a list of cartridges that have earned the right to inclusion by being very, very good at what they do. It’s not a list of my favorite cartridges: I admittedly have dubious practical taste. Rather, this is a list of big-game cartridges that have proven worthy on no uncertain terms.
I anticipate the most consternation will come from lovers of the .243 Winchester, the classic .30-30 Winchester, and the Wee-08…I mean .308 Winchester. Because, you see, when it comes to really, truly capable big-game cartridges, those don’t make the cut.
Let’s just get that out in the open. But, please, before you fire up the tar and gather the feathers, keep in mind that while I stand behind what I write, my tongue is planted firmly in cheek as I peck away at my keyboard.
Without further ado, here is a look at 10 cartridges I consider the most legitimately capable big-game rounds available today, spanning the spectrum from light deer and antelope cartridges up to an honest big bear stopper.
6.5-284 Norma
At the price of more recoil and a lot less barrel life, the 6.5-284 does everything the 6.5 Creedmoor does in the field and does it better. Handloaders wanting a high-performance 6.5mm rifle gain a solid 250 fps by stepping up to the 6.5-284, which is about the same jump gained by going from a .30-06 to a .300 Win. Mag.
This cartridge is included here for one reason: It has proven to be one of the most capable options for long-range hunting, which is the biggest trend on western America’s hunting scene. Whether you detest the practice of sniping big game at extended distances or you idolize the TV practitioners that promote such hunting methods matters not for the sake of this discussion.
The cartridge can get it done without breaking a sweat. Don’t believe cartridges sweat? Try and get your .308 to keep up with the fellow shooting one-MOA steel targets all the way to 1,200 yards with his 6.5-284.
I don’t have space here to crunch comparison numbers, but a few minutes spent on a good ballistic calculator will show that the 6.5-284 smokes most popular hunting cartridges in terms of retained weight and minimal wind drift at extreme distances.
Lots of hunters exercising their right to shoot game at distances that would bulge the eyes of our forefathers choose to do so with Berger VLD Hunting bullets—and with great success in most cases. Respectfully, I submit that projectiles engineered to provide predictable expansion and controlled weight loss are superior, particularly those long-range super-bullets such as Hornady’s new ELD-X and Nosler’s AccuBond Long Range.
As with the 6.5 Creedmoor, bullets in the 120- to 140-grain weight range work superbly on deer-size game. When stepping up to heavier game, a 140-grain projectile designed for controlled expansion and deep penetration is much better.
How far is too far? Assuming you’re rifleman enough to put your first shot into the vital zone every time, the cartridge has what it takes to kill cleanly at 1,000 yards and beyond. No offense, but most of y’all just aren’t. So even if you own and hunt with a super-accurate 6.5-284, exercise your ethics and keep it practical.
7mm Remington Magnum
I am a reluctant admirer of this cartridge. It couldn’t be excluded from this roundup even if I weren’t, since it’s one of the most popular big-game cartridges. I’ve come to respect it tremendously.
Oddly, with light-for-caliber bullets in the 140- and even 150-grain range,
it doesn’t offer eyebrow-raising performance increases over mundane cartridges, such as the .30-06 or .270, with similar-weight projectiles. However, when the bullets get heavy, the “Seven Mag” gets going. Judicious handloads can push 168-grain Bergers, 175-grain Nosler Partitions and Hornady ELD-Xs, and Berger 180-grain bullets at capable velocities, making it one of the finest everyman’s long-distance cartridges.
Until a few years ago, I was an all-American .30-caliber man, my gaggingly long Austrian name notwithstanding. While I still revere .308-diameter projectiles for their many outstanding characteristics, diligent application eventually revealed to me (I’m slow, but I get there) that 7mm (.284) diameter bullets are inherently more aerodynamic, at least in common weights, than their slightly fatter cousins.
I do think the magnum versions of those fatter cousins still hit harder, courtesy of a larger frontal diameter and increased bullet weight, but for the average guy—and even the accomplished rifleman—the 7mm Rem. Mag. is easier to shoot by virtue of less recoil.
Some old-timers have a sour taste over the 7mm Rem. Mag. In the early years it quickly developed a reputation for poor killing ability, which wasn’t a fault of the cartridge at all. Rather, it stemmed from ammo manufacturers loading soft, thin-jacketed hunting bullets designed for the much-slower 7×57 Mauser
cartridge into the 7mm Rem. Mag. On impact, they tended to blow to bits, resulting in huge craters and little penetration. Long blood trails and extensive meat loss did little to endear the cartridge to traditional American hunters.
Today, it’s much better understood, and when stoked with a long, sleek, high-BC bullet designed for high velocities, it’s probably the most practical long-range hunting cartridge available.
28 Nosler
While its much older, more established, smaller 7mm brother is arguably the most practical long-range hunting cartridge available, the 28 Nosler is arguably the best of the best—if you walk practicality off the metaphorical plank.
It pushes a 175-grain Nosler ABLR or Hornady ELD-X at 3,125 fps, and does so from a standard-length action. Yes, there are faster cartridges, such as the 7mm Remington Ultra Mag, but none offer quite the ideal balance of usability and performance that the 28 Nosler does.
The 28 Nosler isn’t a new concept. Gunwerks’s 7mm LRM is very similar, and like-performing wildcats abound. All Nosler did was perfect (arguably, of course) the non-belted, standard-length magnum 7mm.
Of all the cartridges on this list, the 28 Nosler is the only one not proven by at least a half-decade of use and is the only one too young to have earned the stamp of popular approval. So I’m going out on a limb a bit by including it. What I like about it is the refined design (I really do think it’s the best of the standard-length modern magnums), plus the fact that Nosler brass is typically very consistent, favoring accuracy. And, of course, it’s in my favorite far-shooting bullet diameter: 7mm.
With light 7mm bullets the 28 Nosler puts lasers to shame. With heavy Partitions and X-type bullets, it penetrates like a depth charge. But in light of what it’s really good at, one may as well just go with a heavy, aerodynamic hunting bullet and use it for everything. There’s not a hooved animal on the North American continent that it’s not prime for.
.300 Winchester Magnum
.300 Winchester Magnum
For the fella that can handle the recoil and doesn’t mind spending the extra money on ammo, the .300 Win. Mag. is arguably the best worldwide big-game cartridge there is. For such a hunter, it’s a better choice than the glorious .30-06, just because it carries more energy downrange and shoots a bit flatter. Plus, the .300 Win. Mag. excels with long, heavy, aerodynamic bullets that hold on to velocity and buck the wind beautifully, making it capable as far out as a good rifleman can keep his shots in the vitals.
For many decades, the 7mm Rem. Mag. held the spot as the most popular magnum cartridge available. A decade or so ago the gap closed, and according to many polls, the .300 Win. Mag. has now edged to the front. Were I pressed to guess why, I’d say that the bigger cartridge just kills a little faster, probably a product of the greater frontal diameter. I’ve shot a lot of game with my favorite .300, ranging from 40-pound steenbok to 1,200-pound moose and rarely do properly hit animals go farther than a step or two.
Another advantage the .300 Win. Mag. shares with the .30-06 and 7mm Rem. Mag. is the availability of ammunition worldwide. The last time I went to Africa, my baggage was lost for a couple of days. No problem: I borrowed a pocketful of the outfitter’s outstanding 200-grain Norma Oryx handloads and went hunting. A big blue wildebeest fell to that bullet before my baggage arrived.
Speaking of bullets, there’s little one can’t accomplish with a good 180-grain pill from a .30-caliber magnum, but don’t neglect the heavier projectiles. One of my favorites is the 200-grain Nosler AccuBond.
Another is the new 200-grain Hornady ELD-X. With it I dropped an old aoudad ram with one shot at 641 yards; it’s become my go-to long-distance bullet. (Note that for me a very long shot on game is 600 yards. I don’t promote extreme-range shooting at game.) As for factory loads, I’ve had incredibly good results using Federal’s 180-grain Trophy Bonded Tip; it gave me 13 one-shot kills in Africa after my luggage arrived.
Much as I respect the .30-06 and the 7mm Rem. Mag., if I had to choose one big-game cartridge to hunt the world with for the rest of my life, I’d opt for the .300 Win. Mag.
.25-06 Remington
This is the cartridge the .243 Winchester always wished it could be. Offering outstanding velocities and just enough bullet weight to be really effective, at a very polite price in recoil, the .25-06 is one of the finest deer and pronghorn antelope cartridges ever devised.
With bullets in the 75- to 87- grain range, it’s also superb for predators. But I digress. Choose a sleek bullet in the 110- to 117-grain range, which will exit the muzzle of your favorite deer slayer somewhere between 3,000 and 3,100 fps, and never look back. You’ll be able to reach out to 400-plus yards—if you’re rifleman enough to do so ethically—with outstanding effect.
As for the bigger game, well, the .25-06 is not as good as the larger-diameter bullets flung by other cartridges on this list. But with a 115-grain Nosler Partition, it will do for caribou and elk as long as good shot presentations are taken.
.280 Ackley Improved
For the chap who pines for magnum performance but clings to the advantages of a standard-size cartridge (greater magazine capacity, less recoil, more efficient powder usage, less costly brass, longer barrel life), the .280 Ackley Improved is a wonder drug.
By blowing out the case walls to a straighter taper and the case shoulder to a much steeper angle, P.O. Ackley (who was the master of the improved cartridge case) turned the languishing .280 Remington into a fire-breathing dragon capable of 7mm Rem. Mag.-like performance.
Stoked with healthy charges of Reloder 19 or 22 under a 150-grain Barnes TTSX or 160-grain Nosler AccuBond, the .280 AI smokes big bull elk like a Sicilian crime lord smokes a Cuban cigar—there just shouldn’t be that much pure goodness in such a compact package. I dropped what was at the time my biggest bull with one well-placed shot at 519 yards with the 150-grain TTSX, which exits the muzzle of my custom rifle at 3,060 fps. For electrocuting whitetails in their tracks inside 400 yards, load a 140-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip, Hornady SST, or Sierra GameKing at 3,150 fps.
Better yet, the .280 AI is a legitimate long-range performer. Hornady’s Joe Theilen shoots one in 1,000-yard benchrest competition with outstanding success. Loaded with a premium .284-diameter match projectile, such as Barnes Bullets’s 171-grain Match Burner or Hornady’s 162-grain A-Max, it comfortably gets the job done to 1,200 yards.
Want to take your match-shooting skills across No Man’s Land into the murky realm of long-range hunting? Load your .280 AI with Hornady’s new 162- or 175-grain ELD-X match-accurate hunting bullets and never look back.
Not versatile, you say? Au contraire! Courtesy of the genius of Ackley’s design, you can safely and effectively fire garden-variety .280 Remington ammo in your .280 AI rifle. In fact, that’s the least expensive way to produce appropriate brass for your improved chamber. That little characteristic has pulled more than one wandering adventurer molested by the unreliability of the airline out of a slump and put him back in the hunting game. Plus, Nosler loads factory .280 AI ammo for those who don’t handload.
.338 Winchester Magnum
Really, all you need to know about this great cartridge is that the late, great Elmer Keith loved it and living legend Dave Petzal loves it. I recently asked Craig Boddington, who is arguably the most experienced dangerous-game hunter/writer alive, if he considers the .338 Win. Mag. to be a legitimate big bear stopper. (Most cartridges will kill a bear; few will stop one bent on killing you before he bites your scalp off.)
Boddington replied with an emphatic yes and pointed out that although bore diameter (.338) is a significant 0.037-inch smaller than the .375 H&H Magnum, the .338 Win. Mag. drives a 250-grain projectile at 2,700 fps or better, which matches the velocity of 260-grain bullets out of the bigger magnum.
And with such bullets, it offers better sec-tional density (0.313 vs. 0.264). In fact, the 250-grain .338 projectile betters even 300-grain .375 bullets, which boast an already-impressive sectional density of 0.305. In English, that means that heavy .338 Win. Mag. bullets will penetrate like the proverbial runaway freight train.
Loaded with a heavy Nosler Partition, Barnes TSX, Hornady GMX, Swift A-Frame, or the like, the .338 Win. Mag. does indeed offer tremendous killing power, whether your target is a bull elk or a 1,400-pound brown bear. Plus, it’s more versatile than the .375 H&H for several reasons. It shoots flatter, courtesy of higher muzzle velocity, and is more suitable for shots stretching past 250 yards. Additionally, it can be loaded with lighter bullets in the 185- to 200-grain range at 3,000 to 3,200 fps, making it a flat-shooting deer rifle. Handloaders wishing to stretch their lethal distance have long-range bullets designed for the .338 Lapua at their disposal.
I’ve said that a good .300 Win. Mag. teamed with a reliable .375 H&H sets a hunter up to hunt any game around the world. But if you’re not a world traveler, there’s a better way. Pair a reliable .338 Win. Mag. with a fine, accurate deer rifle in 6.5 Creedmoor, 6.5×284 Norma, or .280 Ackley Improved, and you’ll be well equipped to hunt anything that walks the North American continent.
.270 Winchester
Although there are younger, more modern cartridges that outpace the classic .270 Winchester at extreme ranges, I’ve long said that Jack O’Connor’s favorite is still one of the very best deer cartridges.
Some folks like to talk about shot placement and how with the right shot presentation even a .223 will kill a moose stone dead. Me, I like to be able to kill big, heavy-boned, densely muscled deer from any angle, should the need arise. That means shooting a cartridge that throws enough lead and throws it hard.
The .270 is one such cartridge. Loaded with a premium hunting bullet, such as a Nosler Partition, Barnes TTSX, Hornady GMX, or Swift Scirocco II, a savvy hunter can rake his bullet through the hip and into the vitals of a buck—even a big muley in the Rockies or a bulky whitetail in Alberta—and be confident that it’s got what it takes to kill cleanly.
You may argue that ethical hunters take only clean shot presentations. You’re right, of course. Thing is, shooting the right cartridge and bullet broadens the definition of clean, ethical presentations considerably, which can be heartening when the biggest buck you’ve ever seen is about to disappear into a thicket on the last evening of a hunt you’ve saved a decade for.
.30-06 Springfield
By and large, most game in America is shot inside of 200 yards, and no cartridge is more capable than the .30-06 for that use. This old warhorse is America’s most popular hunting cartridge—hard to believe considering that it’s well over 100 years old. It earned that title the hard way, and maintains it the same way, by proving year in and year out that for all-around use, it can’t be beat.
Past 200 yards the faster .30s begin to edge it out because they carry more energy, but in the hands of a skillful rifleman the old ’06 is ideal for deer, antelope, caribou, elk, and moose out to 300 yards or so. And, yes, many deer and elk are taken well in excess of that each year. I’m not saying that it can’t do it; it’s just that past 300 yards there are cartridges that do it better.
Many hunters opt to shoot the lighter 150- and 165-grain bullets in their .30-06s, and they work great on deer-size game. However, where the ’06 really shines is with 180-grain projectiles (and here’s where it really pulls away from the .308). Heavier bullets have far better aerodynamics and offer considerably higher sectional densities—which is a measure that, all other factors being equal, predicts the penetrating ability of a projectile. While heavy bullets start out a bit slower than their lighter siblings, they hold on to velocity better and soon overtake them, thus offering considerable more on-impact authority downrange courtesy of their heavier mass.
Handloading the .30-06 can boost performance. Most 180-grain factory loads produce about 2,700 fps; a good handload can add 50 to 100 fps to that. My favorite bullets for the .30-06 are Nosler’s 180-grain AccuBond, Swift’s 180-grain Scirocco II, Sierra’s 180-grain GameKing, Barnes’s 180-grain TTSX, and, last but not least, Federal’s 180-grain Trophy Bonded Tip. That last one may be the best of them all, but it’s unfortunately available only in factory-loaded form.
6.5 Creedmoor
Originally designed as a 1,000-yard match cartridge, this super-efficient little round quickly caught on among savvy, precision-minded hunters that want good performance at low recoil. Designed by a national champion long-distance shooter (Dennis DeMille) and the Einstein of modern cartridge development (Dave Emary), the 6.5 Creedmoor nips at the heels of the superb 6.5-284 but is less finicky in the accuracy department and offers substantially greater barrel life.
Of all the cartridges discussed here, the 6.5 Creedmoor, in my opinion, is the most inherently accurate. I’ve never met one that wouldn’t shoot one-MOA groups, and many of them will halve that, even with factory ammunition.
While the 6.5 Creedmoor pushes the long, aerodynamic 140-grain projectiles so popular among its followers at around 2,720 fps—a full 220 fps slower than a .270 Winchester shoots the same weight—the sleek 6.5 bullets hang on to velocity much more efficiently.
As distances increase, the 6.5 gains on the .270 and eventually passes it. In other words, at long range the 140-grain 6.5 Creedmoor bullet is both going faster and has better sectional density than the 140-grain .270 bullet and will impact with more authority. Now, that’s a tunnel-vision comparison of two superb cartridges, but it serves to illustrate the effectiveness of this little short-action 6.5mm.
While many deer and more than a few elk fall each year to Hornady’s ultra-accurate 140-grain A-Max 6.5mm match bullet, hunters are better off with a bullet actually designed for terminal performance on big game. Choose a 120- to 143-grain version that your gun likes for use on deer and pronghorn-size game. Should you wish to push the 6.5’s boundaries and hunt elk-size game with it, opt for a tough 140-grain bullet designed for controlled expansion, such as a Nosler Partition or AccuBond or a Swift A-Frame, or a homogeneous Barnes 120-grain TTSX or Hornady 120-grain GMX.
Read more: http://www.petersenshunting.com/ammo/americas-top-10-big-game-cartridges/#ixzz4yLgpWgrT
This is from scenes from the Movie “War & Peace”. It is based on the Napoleonic Wars period. When the up to now brilliant Nappy stupidly invade Russia.
Frankly it was the only part worth seeing! Enjoy Grumpy
Why ? Asks Grumpy
Shootable Gold Plated Tommy Guns, Stainless Desert Eagles – Thompson & Magnum Research – SHOT Show 2016
Buy a Thompson on GunsAmerica: https://www.gunsamerica.com/Search.aspx?T=thompson
Read more at Auto-Ordnance: http://www.auto-ordnance.com/
Who doesn’t want to own a piece of American History in their collection? I know I do. The weapon of choice by gangsters like Al Capone and John Dilllinger, the “Tommy Gun” was synonymous with fire power in the ’20s. However that is not all. During World War II The Thompson served as a constant companion of American soldiers and played a significant role in battles won in the Pacific and Europe, making The Thompson submachine gun a historical firearm for the good guys, too.
Kahr Firearms Group has proudly preserved the legacy of Auto-Ordnance Corporation, the original maker of the Thompson submachine gun. For 2016 Auto-Ordnance is offering new finish options to the T150D line of Tommy Guns. The T150DTG is the Titanium Gold model with all the classic details of the time-honored original. The wood is beautiful American walnut. The frame and receiver are machined from solid steel and finished in titanium gold. It will come with a 30 round stick magazine and a 50 round drum. Due to the fact that the Titanium Gold finish is done by an outside company, A.O. is expecting only 15 to 20 available each month for purchase. The retail price will be roughly $2500 . Unfortunately for those of you in New York and Connecticut, Tommy Guns are prohibited.
Model: T150DTG
Caliber: 45ACP
Barrel: 16.5”, finned (w/compensator 18”) / 1 in 16 right hand twist
Material: Steel with Gold Finish
Length: 41” Overall
Weight: 13 lbs
Sights: Pinned in front blade, Open rear adjustable
Stock: Walnut fixed stock and vertical foregrip
Magazines: 50 round drum & 30 round stick magazine
Operation: Blow back, fires from a closed bolt
Warranty: 1 year
Buy a Desert Eagle: https://www.gunsamerica.com/Search.aspx?T=desert%20eagle
Read More at MRI: https://www.magnumresearch.com/
Magnum Research, Inc. a 30 year old company, is well known for producing the distinctive Desert Eagle pistol. In June 2010 Kahr Firearms Group purchased Magnum Research Inc (MRI) and continued the production of the pop culture icon Desert Eagle pistols. New for 2016 MRI is adding the .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum to the already exiting .50 AE caliber stainless steel line with the integrated muzzle brake. The Mark XIX (Mark 19) Desert Eagle Pistols now offer a true interchangeable platform with 3 calibers.
The standard configuration will be in a 6 inch barrel, but a 10 inch barrel will be an option (in the black oxide finish only). Once you purchase one handgun, you will have the platform to build any of the calibers with a simple change of the barrel, magazine and (in the case of the .357 magnum) the bolt assembly. Here’s how it works. The .50 AE handguns are convertible to the .44 Magnum by switching the barrel and magazine. This is a simple conversion that can be done in seconds. For converting to the .357 Magnum, you will need to switch the barrel, magazine and bolt assembly so this may take a few minutes. All of the conversion kits can be purchased from retailers or directly from MRI. The MSRP on the Desert Eagle pistol is $3035. The conversion kits range from $476 to $624 depending on the finish and they are available now.
Model: Stainless with Integral Muzzle Brake
Caliber: .50AE (DE50SRMB) / .44 Magnum (DE44SRMB)/ .357 Magnum (DE357SRMB)
Barrel: 6”
Length O/A: 10.75”
Height: 6.25”
Slide Width: 1.25”
Weight: 4 lbs 7 oz (.50AE) / 4 lbs 8 oz (.44 Magnum) / 4 lbs 10 oz (.357 Magnum)
Sight: Combat type, fixed
Finish: Brushed Stainless Steel
The Battle of Waterloo
Today is the 203rd anniversary. Of when The Duke of Wellington finally put the French under Napoleon in their rightful place.
So to our British Friend out there, Well Done!!!
The Last Stand of Napoleon’s OLD Guard at the end of the Battle
I could not imagine fighting in some of those uniforms they
wore back then.