Categories
Gear & Stuff

Swords or the BFD (Big Fucking Knife)

Image result for swordsman
 

Now the sword even today is a very powerful symbol. It is a sign of Power, Rank and of the idea of Swift Justice.Image result for roman swords art

  It is also a symbol of the Cross to Christians and of Islam the crescent of the scimitar sword . It all depending on the shape of the Blade.Image result for crusades swords art
Image result for crusades muslim swords art
  Moving right along smartly now. The Sword is also a very complex thing in of itself. As one should not think of it. Of being just a large chunk of sharpen steel like a wrecking bar.
Image result for forging a sword art
  Because your basic fighting sword is a very complex and sophisticated blend of iron, steel and other alloys.
Image result for sword fighting  art
That will allow it to be used in both the attack and defense mode.Related image
Plus the added bonus of holding a razor sharp edge.Image result for razor sharp edge of a  sword
  Sword fighting also is another complex subject. That it was & is a very expensive skill to acquire.Image result for sword fighting  art
Which contrary to the Movies. Was a skill that was restricted to a very small group of folks. Because of the time and expense involved. Also the Rich did not want the poor to know how to fight as well as they did!
  That and most folks back then were mostly concerned with growing crops.Image result for middle ages farmers
Since in the bad old days. Famine was a constant worry for everyone. Image result for middle ages famine
  Which in Queens English means this.
  If the crops failed and they did from time to time. Except for the King and some of the High Clergy. Everyone else went hungry for the rest of the year. Then things got really ugly & very fast!Image result for middle ages famine
Here is ome more information about Swords!
I hope that you liked this.                                                                                 Grumpy
________________________________
Notice on how a couple of guys with swords. Can control a big crowd very easily!
___________________________________
Why one should not bring a sword in a modern gunfight
Here is also some more information about fighting blades

Sword

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Sword (disambiguation).

Swiss longsword, 15th or 16th century

sword is a bladed weapon intended for slashing or thrusting that is longer than a knife or dagger. The precise definition of the term varies with the historical epoch or the geographical region under consideration. A sword consists of a long blade attached to a hilt. The blade can be straight or curved. Thrusting swords have a pointed tip on the blade, and tend to be straighter; slashing swords have sharpened cutting edge on one or both sides of the blade, and are more likely to be curved. Many swords are designed for both thrusting and slashing.
Historically, the sword developed in the Bronze Age, evolving from the dagger; the earliest specimens date to about 1600 BC. The later Iron Age sword remained fairly short and without a crossguard. The spatha, as it developed in the Late Roman army, became the predecessor of the European sword of the Middle Ages, at first adopted as the Migration period sword, and only in the High Middle Ages, developed into the classical arming sword with crossguard. The word swordcontinues the Old Englishsweord.[1]
The use of a sword is known as swordsmanship or (in an early modern or modern context) as fencing. In the Early Modern period, western sword design diverged into roughly two forms, the thrusting swords and the sabers.
The thrusting swords such as the rapier and eventually the smallsword were designed to impale their targets quickly and inflict deep stab wounds. Their long and straight yet light and well balanced design made them highly maneuverable and deadly in a duel but fairly ineffective when used in a slashing or chopping motion. A well aimed lunge and thrust could end a fight in seconds with just the sword’s point, leading to the development of a fighting style which closely resembles modern fencing.
The saber (sabre) and similar blades such as the cutlass were built more heavily and were more typically used in warfare. Built for slashing and chopping at multiple enemies, often from horseback, the saber’s long curved blade and slightly forward weight balance gave it a deadly character all its own on the battlefield. Most sabers also had sharp points and double edged blades, making them capable of piercing soldier after soldier in a cavalry charge. Sabers continued to see battlefield use until the early 20th century. The US Navy kept tens of thousands of sturdy cutlasses in their armory well into World War II and many were issued to marines in the Pacific as jungle machetes.
Non-European weapons called “sword” include single-edged weapons such as the Middle Eastern scimitar, the Chinese dao and the related Japanese katana. The Chinese jian is an example of a non-European double-edged sword, like the European models derived from the double-edged Iron Age sword.

History[edit]

Ancient history[edit]

The first weapons that can be described as “swords” date to around 3300 BC. They have been found in Arslantepe, Turkey, are made from arsenical bronze, and are about 60 cm (24 in) long.[2][3] Some of them are inlaid with silver.

Bronze Age[edit]

Main article: Bronze Age sword

Apa-type swords, 17th-century BC.

The swords found together with the Nebra skydisk, ca. 1600 BC.

The sword developed from the knife or dagger. A knife is unlike a dagger in that a knife has only one cutting surface, while a dagger has two cutting surfaces. when the construction of longer blades became possible, from the late 3rd millennium BC in the Middle East, first in arsenic copper, then in tin-bronze.
Blades longer than 60 cm (24 in) were rare and not practical until the late Bronze Age because the tensile strength of bronze is relatively low, and consequently longer blades would bend easily. The development of the sword out of the dagger was gradual; the first weapons that can be classified as swords without any ambiguity are those found in Minoan Crete, dated to about 1700 BC, reaching a total length of more than 100 cm. These are the “type A” swords of the Aegean Bronze Age.
One of the most important, and longest-lasting, types swords of the European Bronze Age was the Naue II type (named for Julius Naue who first described them), also known as Griffzungenschwert (lit. “grip-tongue sword”). This type first appears in c. the 13th century BC in Northern Italy (or a general Urnfield background), and survives well into the Iron Age, with a life-span of about seven centuries. During its lifetime, metallurgy changed from bronze to iron, but not its basic design.
Naue II swords were exported from Europe to the Aegean, and as far afield as Ugarit, beginning about 1200 BC, i.e. just a few decades before the final collapse of the palace cultures in the Bronze Age collapse.[4] Naue II swords could be as long as 85 cm, but most specimens fall into the 60 to 70 cm range. Robert Drews linked the Naue Type II Swords, which spread from Southern Europe into the Mediterranean, with the Bronze Age collapse.[5] Naue II swords, along with Nordic full-hilted swords, were made with functionality and aesthetics in mind. [6]The hilts of these swords were beautifully crafted and often contained false rivets in order to make the sword more visually appealing. Swords coming from northern Denmark and northern Germany usually contained three or more fake rivets in the hilt.[7]
Sword production in China is attested from the Bronze Age Shang Dynasty.[8] The technology for bronze swords reached its high point during the Warring States period and Qin Dynasty. Amongst the Warring States period swords, some unique technologies were used, such as casting high tin edges over softer, lower tin cores, or the application of diamond shaped patterns on the blade (see sword of Goujian). Also unique for Chinese bronzes is the consistent use of high tin bronze (17–21% tin) which is very hard and breaks if stressed too far, whereas other cultures preferred lower tin bronze (usually 10%), which bends if stressed too far. Although iron swords were made alongside bronze, it was not until the early Han period that iron completely replaced bronze.[9]
In South Asia earliest available Bronze age swords of copper were discovered in the Harappan sites, in present-day Pakistan, and date back to 2300 BC[citation needed]. Swords have been recovered in archaeological findings throughout the GangesJamunaDoab region of India, consisting of bronze but more commonly copper.[10] Diverse specimens have been discovered in Fatehgarh, where there are several varieties of hilt.[10] These swords have been variously dated to times between 1700–1400 BC, but were probably used more notably in the opening centuries of the 1st millennium BC.[10]

Iron Age[edit]

Main article: Iron Age sword

Hallstatt swords

Iron became increasingly common from the 13th century B.C. Before that the use of swords was less frequent. The iron was not quench-hardened although often containing sufficient carbon, but work-hardened like bronze by hammering. This made them comparable or only slightly better in terms of strength and hardness to bronze swords. They could still bend during use rather than spring back into shape. But the easier production, and the better availability of the raw material for the first time permitted the equipment of entire armies with metal weapons, though Bronze Age Egyptian armies were sometimes fully equipped with bronze weapons.[11]
Ancient swords are often found at burial sites. The sword was often placed on the right side of the corpse. However, there are exceptions to this. A lot of times the sword was kept over the corpse. In many late Iron Age graves, the sword and the scabbard were bent at 180 degrees. It was known as killing the sword. Thus they might have considered swords as the most potent and powerful object.[12]

Greco-Roman antiquity[edit]

Further information: Migration period sword

By the time of Classical Antiquity and the Parthian and Sassanid Empires in Iran, iron swords were common. The Greek xiphos and the Roman gladius are typical examples of the type, measuring some 60 to 70 cm (24 to 28 in).[13][14] The late Roman Empire introduced the longer spatha[15] (the term for its wielder, spatharius, became a court rank in Constantinople), and from this time, the term longsword is applied to swords comparatively long for their respective periods.[16]
Swords from the Parthian and Sassanian Empires were quite long, the blades on some late Sassanian swords being just under a metre long.
Swords were also used to administer various physical punishments, such as non-surgical amputation or capital punishment by decapitation. The use of a sword, an honourable weapon, was regarded in Europe since Roman times as a privilege reserved for the nobility and the upper classes.[17]
The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea mentions swords of Indian iron and steel being exported from India to Greece.[18]Sri Lankan and Indian Blades made of Damascus steel also found their way into Persia.[18]

Persian antiquity[edit]

In the first millennium BC the Persian armies used a sword that was originally of Scythian design called the akinaka (acinaces). However, the great conquests of the Persians made the sword more famous as a Persian weapon, to the extent that the true nature of the weapon has been lost somewhat as the name Akinaka has been used to refer to whichever form of sword the Persian army favoured at the time.

Darius I of Persia holding an acinaces in his lap

It is widely believed that the original akinaka was a 14 to 18 inch double-edged sword. The design was not uniform and in fact identification is made more on the nature of the scabbard than the weapon itself; the scabbard usually has a large, decorative mount allowing it to be suspended from a belt on the wearer’s right side. Because of this, it is assumed that the sword was intended to be drawn with the blade pointing downwards ready for surprise stabbing attacks.
In the 12th century, the Seljuq dynasty had introduced the curved shamshir to Persia, and this was in extensive use by the early 16th century.

Chinese antiquity[edit]

Chinese steel swords made their first appearance in the later part of the Western Zhou Dynasty, but were not widely used until the 3rd century BC Han Dynasty.[9] The Chinese Dao (刀 pinyin dāo) is single-edged, sometimes translated as sabre or broadsword, and the Jian (劍or剑 pinyin jiàn) is double-edged. The zhanmadao (literally “horse chopping sword”), an extremely long, anti-cavalry sword from the Song dynasty era.

Middle Ages[edit]

Europe[edit]

Battle scene from the Morgan Bible of Louis IXshowing 13th-century swords
Further information: Carolingian swordRomanesque sword, and Longsword
Further information: Oakeshott typology

During the Middle Ages sword technology improved, and the sword became a very advanced weapon. It was frequently used by men in battle, particularly during an attack. The spatha type remained popular throughout the Migration period and well into the Middle Ages. Vendel Age spathas were decorated with Germanic artwork (not unlike the Germanic bracteates fashioned after Roman coins). The Viking Agesaw again a more standardized production, but the basic design remained indebted to the spatha.[19]
Around the 10th century, the use of properly quenched hardened and tempered steel started to become much more common than in previous periods. The Frankish ‘Ulfberht‘ blades (the name of the maker inlaid in the blade) were of particularly consistent high quality.[20]Charles the Bald tried to prohibit the export of these swords, as they were used by Vikings in raids against the Franks.
Wootz steel which is also known as Damascus steel was a unique and highly prized steel developed on the Indian subcontinent as early as the 5th century BC. Its properties were unique due to the special smelting and reworking of the steel creating networks of iron carbides described as a globular cementite in a matrix of pearlite. The use of Damascus steel in swords became extremely popular in the 16th and 17th centuries.[nb 1][21]
It was only from the 11th century that Norman swords began to develop the crossguard (quillons). During the Crusades of the 12th to 13th century, this cruciform type of arming sword remained essentially stable, with variations mainly concerning the shape of the pommel. These swords were designed as cutting weapons, although effective points were becoming common to counter improvements in armour, especially the 14th-century change from mail to plate armour.[22]
It was during the 14th century, with the growing use of more advanced armour, that the hand and a half sword, also known as a “bastard sword“, came into being. It had an extended grip that meant it could be used with either one or two hands. Though these swords did not provide a full two-hand grip they allowed their wielders to hold a shield or parrying dagger in their off hand, or to use it as a two-handed sword for a more powerful blow.[23]
In the Middle Ages, the sword was often used as a symbol of the word of God. The names given to many swords in mythologyliterature, and history reflected the high prestige of the weapon and the wealth of the owner.[24]

Greater Middle East[edit]

The earliest evidence of curved swords, or scimitars (and other regional variants as the Arabiansaif, the Persianshamshirand the Turkickilij) is from the 9th century, when it was used among soldiers in the Khurasan region of Persia.[25]

East Asia[edit]

A Japanese wakizashi of the 17th century, with its koshirae and shirasaya.

Chinese dao and scabbard of the 17th–18th century

As steel technology improved, single-edged weapons became popular throughout Asia. Derived from the ChineseJian or dao, the Koreanhwandudaedo are known from the early medieval Three Kingdoms. Production of the Japanesetachi, a precursor to the katana, is recorded from ca. 900 AD (see Japanese sword).[26]
Japan was famous for the swords it forged in the early 13th century for the class of warrior-nobility known as the Samurai. The types of swords used by the Samurai included the ōdachi (extra long field sword), tachi (long cavalry sword), katana(long sword), and wakizashi (shorter companion sword for katana). Japanese swords that pre-date the rise of the samurai caste include the tsurugi (straight double-edged blade) and chokutō (straight one-edged blade).[27] Japanese swordmaking reached the height of its development in the 15th and 16th centuries, when samurai increasingly found a need for a sword to use in closer quarters, leading to the creation of the modern katana.[28]
Western historians have said that Japanese katana were among the finest cutting weapons in world military history.[29][30][31]

Indian Subcontinent[edit]

Khanda is a double-edge straight sword. It is often featured in religious iconography, theatre and art depicting the ancient history of India. Some communities venerate the weapon as a symbol of Shiva. It is a common weapon in the martial arts in the Indian subcontinent.[32] Khanda often appears in Hindu, Buddhist and Sikh scriptures and art.[33] In Sri Lanka, a unique wind furnace was used to produce the high quality steel. This gave the blade a very hard cutting edge and beautiful patterns. For these reasons it became a very popular trading material.[34]

A


[Message clipped]  View entire message

Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Dramatic sword fight breaks out between Sikhs at Golden Temple in India

Preview YouTube video Indiana Jones – Arab Swordsman Scene

Categories
All About Guns

Mauser C96 in .30 Mauser (Mfg.1904)













 

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Our so called "Friends" just do not give up do they?

A Social Security Gun Ban, Part 2?

A Social Security Gun Ban, Part 2?


Even though Congress repealed Obama’s Social Security Disability (SSI) gun ban in 2017, a bill in Congress would effectively take that principle and expand it to the broad range of entitlements — Social Security old age, Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, ObamaCare subsidies, etc.
Here’s how that would happen.
The Cornyn-Schumer-Feinstein-Blumenthal-Murphy legislation, S. 2135, would bribe the states and force federal agencies to send every possible eligible name to the national gun ban list, NICS.
This “Fix NICS” bill means that a whole lot of decent Americans (like seniors) are going to be added into the system.
Some people claim that S. 2135 — and its counterpart in the House — are really not that bad.  After all, they say, the bills don’t contain the words “traffic tickets,” “veterans,” “senior citizens,” and so forth.
But that’s the problem.  Legislators like Chuck Schumer are not going to tell you this up front.

There’s more to it than just reading the bills

Remember the 2007 NICS Improvement Amendments Act that harmed so many veterans?  That legislation NEVER contained the word “veteran.”
But GOA knew what legislators were up to … we knew how veterans were going to be impacted … and so we renamed the legislation, more accurately, as the Veterans Disarmament Act.
Sadly, more than 257,000 veterans have now been disarmed, proving that GOA’s analysis of that disgraceful law was accurate.
The key is this:  You always have to read the legal code and the implementing regulations that are being amended by any particular piece of legislation.
Many gun owners don’t realize that NICS is already denying gun purchases to people who have unpaid traffic tickets — even though you won’t find the words “traffic” or “tickets” in the federal firearms code.
To read more about this, you’ll definitely want to see what a Massachusetts cop told GOA about how an unpaid traffic ticket can lead to a gun ban.
And you can click here to see Shannon Bream of Fox News quoting GOA to help viewers sift “fact from fiction” in December in regard to the Traffic Ticket Gun Ban.
Again, the reason Cornyn-Schumer is so horrible is that it bribes states and forces agencies to achieve 100% compliance with current statutes and regulations — and this is going to result in gun bans for lots of decent Americans whose names are not already in the NICS system.

Seniors at Risk under Fix NICS (S. 2135)

If you have a terrible — but unenforced — statute and you come along with legislation to mandate enforcement, is that a bad thing?
Obviously, it is.
And the unenforced statutes and regulations surrounding the 1968 Act (18 U.S.C. 922(g)), the 2007 Veterans Disarmament Act, and the regulations implementing them are so sucky that they, if fully enforced, would disarm millions — perhaps tens of millions — of decent Americans.
The Code of Federal Regulations disarms you if a “lawful authority” determines you are a “danger” or are unable to manage your checkbook (see 27 CFR 478.11).  “Lawful authority” means a psychiatrist who determines whether a person is eligible for federal benefits. Under these provisions, over 257,000 veterans have lost their guns.
And, in 2016, Barack Obama promulgated regulations which would trawl the SSI disability rolls to do the same for perhaps millions of people on disability.  Congress was shocked, the regulations were overturned at the start of the Trump administration.

But guess what?
The next anti-gun president could do the same with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the children’s health insurance program, ObamaCare recipients, etc.
It doesn’t matter that Congress repealed Obama’s Social Security Disability gun ban in 2017, using their Congressional Review Act (CRA) authority. Under the legal principle that the “later statute trumps the earlier statute, to the extent it is inconsistent,” the Cornyn-Schumer-Feinstein bill will clearly overturn any protections from the CRA resolution.
A future anti-gun president could add more Americans into NICS — sending the names of people with guardians, or people suffering from ADHD, PTSD, post partem depression, regular depression, OCD, or even Alzheimer’s, which currently affects upwards of 40 million people according to a studyfinanced by the National Institutes of Health.  The latter would, no doubt, jeopardize the inheritance of many valuable gun collections.
And Congress would not be able to generate the 2/3 vote in both chambers to overturn the veto from the next anti-gun president.

GOA Media Clips

      
    






Select GOA with your purchase!

What the Media Says About GOA

Categories
Ammo

Classic Ammo – The 6.5mm Creedmoor

6.5mm Creedmoor
6.5 lineup.jpg

Size comparison of some 6.5mm cartridges, left to right: .264 Winchester Magnum6.5×55mm Swedish6.5×52mm Carcano.260 Remington6.5mm Creedmoor6.5mm Grendel
Type Centerfire rifle
Place of origin United States
Production history
Designed 2007
Manufacturer Hornady
Produced 2008
Specifications
Parent case .30 TC
Case type Rimless, bottleneck
Bullet diameter .2644 in (6.72 mm)
Neck diameter .2950 in (7.49 mm)
Shoulder diameter .4620 in (11.73 mm)
Base diameter .4703 in (11.95 mm)
Rim diameter .4730 in (12.01 mm)
Rim thickness .054 in (1.4 mm)
Case length 1.920 in (48.8 mm)
Overall length 2.825 in (71.8 mm)
Case capacity 52.5 gr H2O (3.40 cm3)
Rifling twist 1-8″ (203 mm)
Primer type Large rifle,
Small rifle (Lapua and Starline brass)
Maximum pressure (C.I.P.) 63,100 psi (435 MPa)
Maximum pressure (SAAMI) 62,000 psi (430 MPa)
Ballistic performance
Bullet mass/type Velocity Energy
120 gr (8 g) AMAX 3,020 ft/s (920 m/s) 2,430 ft⋅lbf (3,290 J)
143 gr (9 g) Hornady ELD-X 2,710 ft/s (830 m/s) 2,283 ft⋅lbf (3,095 J)
Test barrel length: 28 inch[not in citation given]
Source(s): Hornady,[1] SAAMI,[2][3] C.I.P.
[4][5]

The 6.5mm Creedmoor, designated 6.5 Creedmoor by SAAMI6,5 Creedmoor by the C.I.P. or 6.5 CM or 6.5 CRDMR for short, is a centerfire rifle cartridge introduced by Hornady in 2007[6] as a modification of the .30 TC,[7] which was based on the .308 Winchester[8]. It was designed specifically for long-range target shooting,[6] although it is also achieving success in game hunting.[7] Bullet for bullet, the 6.5mm Creedmoor achieves a slower muzzle velocity than longer cartridges such as the 6.5-284 Normaor magnum cartridges such as the 6.5mm Remington Magnum. However, due to its 2.825 inches (71.8 mm) overall length, it is capable of being chambered in short-action bolt-action rifles and AR-10 semi-automatic rifles.

Design considerations[edit]

6.5 mm (.264″) bullets, in general, are known for their relatively high sectional density[7] and ballistic coefficients, and have seen success in rifle competition. For some loads the 6.5mm Creedmoor is capable of duplicating the muzzle velocity[2] or trajectory[9] of the .300 Winchester Magnum while generating significantly lower recoil, based on lighter projectile weight. As this cartridge is designed for a bolt face diameter of .473 inches (roughly 12 mm), conversion of a short action rifle to another caliber (such as the .22-250 Remington.243 Winchester or .300 Savage) with similar bolt face diameter generally requires little more than a simple barrel change.

Performance[edit]

This is a medium power cartridge often compared to the .260 Remington and 6.5×47mm Lapua.[10] Three hundred yard energy using 129 grain Hornady SST bullets is listed by an independent reviewer as 1641 ft. lbs.[11] For the 140 grain bullet at 2700 feet per second initial velocity another reviewer reports an MPBR[12] for a six inch high target of 265 yards and reports a manufacturer claim of “almost 1600 ft. lbs.” of retained energy at 300 yards using a 24-inch barrel.[13] SAAMI test data confirms 6.5 mm Creedmoor (fifteen feet from muzzle) velocity of 2,940 fps for the 129 grain bullet and 2,690 for the 140 grain bullet (which compares to .300 Winchester magnum data of 2,930 fps for a 200 grain bullet and 2,665 fps for a 210 grain bullet).[2] Long-range shooter Ray “RayDog” Sanchez summarized the bolt-action Tubb 2000 rifle in 6.5mm Creedmoor as “boringly accurate” at 1000 yards (914.4 metres). He asserted the rifle and ammunition combination he used was able to maintain sub-MOA groups at 1000 yards (914.4 metres).[14]

Handloading[edit]

Only the very longest 140gr bullets will even reach the neck shoulder junction. Right to left: is a 123gr A-Max and Remington 140gr. Calipers are set to magazine length.

Handloading cost for the 6.5 Creedmoor is roughly equivalent to other 6.5mm cartridges, such as the 6.5×47mm Lapua, due to the availability of Lapua small primer brass for both cartridges.[15][16] Norma now makes brass for the cartridge and as of 2017 Norma brass is available through several major retailers at approximately the same cost as Lapua brass. Lapua brass for 6.5×47 lasts about 12 to 20 reloads.[17] Starline sells brass cases with either large or small primer pockets, with small pocket brass costing slightly more.[18] When the 6.5 CM was first introduced it was advertised as a 60,000 psi capable case.[6]However, when it was placed into production Hornady listed it as 62,000 psi and had it SAAMI registered as such. For this reason many hand loaders have had poor experiences reloading for it. Blown primers on the first shot at 62,000 psi is not uncommon. Early shooting articles listed the ammo as loaded to 58,000 psi[19] but later ones list it as 57,000 psi.[20] This is because Hornady reduced the loads in its factory ammo because of complaints that it was often blowing primers.[21]Lapua delivered Creedmoor brass at Shot show 2017,[22] and production quantities became available via major retailers in second quarter 2017. The Lapua version has a small primer pocket.[15][23] Thus, loads from a Lapua Creedmoor should not be used in another manufacturer’s Creedmoor brass that features a large primer pocket without applying proper hand loading test for pressure first. Also the use of a smaller diameter decapping rod is required to size and decap.

Further developments[edit]

From left: 6mm Creedmoor, 6.5mm Creedmoor, .308 Winchester

The 6mm Creedmoor is a necked-down version of the 6.5mm Creedmoor using 6mm (.243 inch) bullets, which are lighter than 6.5mm bullets with similarly reduced recoil. John Snow at Outdoor Life designed it in 2009. As of May 2018, Savage Arms offers 3 bolt action rifles and 1 semiautomatic rifle chambered in 6mm Creedmoor.[24] As of May 2018, Hornady offers 87 gr Varmint Express, 103 gr Precision Hunter and 108 gr Match ammunition in 6mm Creedmoor.[25]

Military use[edit]

In October 2017, U.S. Special Operations Command tested the performance of 7.62 NATO, .260 Remington, and 6.5 Creedmoor cartridges out of SR-25M110A1, and Mk 20 sniper rifles. SOCOM determined that 6.5 Creedmoor performed the best, doubling hit probability at 1,000 meters, increasing effective range by nearly half, reducing wind drift by a third and having less recoil than 7.62 NATO rounds. Because the two rounds have similar dimensions, the same magazines can be used and a rifle can be converted with a barrel change. This led to its adoption and fielding by special operations snipers to replace the 7.62 NATO cartridge in their semi-automatic sniper rifles, planned in early 2019. In response to SOCOM’s adoption, the Department of Homeland Securityalso decided to adopt the round.[26][27]

Categories
All About Guns

The Colt Boa Revolver

Image result for the Colt BOA revolver
Image result for the Colt BOA revolver
COLT - BOA .357 Mag SUPER RARE - One of 600 Made...UNFIRED IN BOX!...Not PYTHON - Picture 7
Image result for the Colt BOA revolver
The rarest of the rarest of the Colt’s Snake series. Since they only made 1200 of them. Making them the smallest number of factory made pistols of the snake series.Image result for the Colt BOA revolver
Now for the really bad news! The Prices are just ridiculous. But if you have gotten bitten by Colt Snake fever. Then good luck & good hunting!Image result for the Colt BOA revolver
Image result for the Colt BOA revolver
COLT - BOA .357 Mag SUPER RARE - One of 600 Made...UNFIRED IN BOX!...Not PYTHON - Picture 4
COLT - BOA .357 Mag SUPER RARE - One of 600 Made...UNFIRED IN BOX!...Not PYTHON - Picture 6
 
Here is some information about them.

Attachments area
Preview YouTube video All About Colt Collecting The Rare Colt Boa snake gun .357 magnum

 

Colt’s Snake Guns

Colt’s Snake Guns
If they get any hotter, they’ll be on fire!” is the way one Colt collector put it after being asked what he thought about the current Colt “snake-gun” marketplace. Colt’s family of seven deadly serpents include the Python, Diamondback, Cobra, Anaconda, King Cobra, Boa and Viper. There haven’t been too many “lottery winners” during the last several years regarding major trademark collectible firearms, but Colt’s snake guns continue to pack potent venom for anyone who ventures too close to their poisonous attraction. What created this marketplace mayhem and madness initially? Why have these revolvers changed so dramatically in price during the past four to five years? Where’s all this extra demand coming from, and what are the demographics behind these recent buyers?
First, let’s establish where the marketplace is right now. Mint, original, 1950s standard-production Pythons with 6″ barrels, high polish, Royal bluing and matching-number boxes and paperwork that had an original $125 manufacturer’s suggested retail price are now selling in excess of $18,000. As a comparison, a Colt Single Action Army during that time period had the same suggested retail but today’s value is under $3,000, and they’re not selling as well.

This factory class-“D” engraved (full coverage), nickel finish, .22 Long Rifle, 6″ barrel Diamondback has a factory letter from Colt confirming its original configuration when it was shipped from the factory on Nov. 12, 1979. It is now almost a requirement to get a factory letter on any snake gun with rare and desirable features, i.e., small caliber, short barrel, nickel finish, engraving, etc.

Diamondbacks are also in high demand currently, especially those revolvers in smaller calibers, shorter barrel lengths and nickel finish. Less than two years ago, a major auction house sold a pair of consecutively numbered Boas with 4″ and 6″ barrels for an unprecedented $14,160. A dealer polled for this article said he just sold a similar set of non-engraved Boas for more than $30,000. Anacondas have at least doubled in value during the past five years, and both Cobra and King Cobra values have also increased significantly. Even the barely toxic Viper, which is considered the red-headed cousin of the snake family, has quadrupled in value since 2010.
One severely afflicted victim in the final stages of this debilitating, snake-venom-induced disease was so delirious, he actually submitted a winning auction bid of $41,026 (that’s not a typo) for a “new-in-box” non-engraved stainless Colt Combat Python with 3″ barrel. It was one of only 19 made for Harrison Carroll and longtime Colt dealer and author Carol Wilkerson in 2004. When contacting Wilkerson after this item sold at gunbroker.com, her text message came back quickly, “Amazing, huh? Someone is nuts. I sold those guns for just over $1,000 when new.”
The Rarity Factor

Considering Smith & Wesson introduced the .44 Mag. cartridge in its pre-Model 29 (five-screw) during 1956, Colt’s last snake, the Anaconda, finally got to the party much later in 1990. The big brother of the Python, the Anaconda utilized the transfer bar safety system and all revolvers were supplied with combat-style black neoprene stocks. Original numbered boxes always help the value of any gun. At a recent auction, this gun finally hammered for almost $2,600, including the buyer’s premium.

With most factory-catalogued snake gun variations, rarity has not been a major factor. More than 100,000 Pythons were manufactured between 1955 and 1969, and the great majority of them were in Royal Blue (nickel finish was added in 1962) with either 4″ or 6″ barrels—not a lot of variations. As a comparison, almost 52,600 SAAs were made during the same time period. In 1960 alone, Python production topped 16,000 units. That’s approximately three times as many revolvers as all the pre-war S&W .357 Registered Magnums that were custom-ordered. So, most Colt snake guns cannot be considered rare. However, shorter barrel lengths, limited-production calibers, optional finishes and other non-standard features do add to a snake gun’s rarity (and value). Moral to the story—during this 15-year time span, almost twice as many Pythons were manufactured as were SAAs (with a lot more variations), yet the value of the SAA is 60 percent less now.

The previously undervalued Viper, a one-year failure on Colt’s family tree, is now a bonafide member of the Colt collectibles club due to the elevated status its relatives have recently achieved. Five years ago, boxed Vipers like this were selling for $1,000—now they’re commanding more than $3,500.

The Hollywood Effect
Despite recent popularity in the collector’s marketplace, snake guns certainly can’t brag about being a major media darling in the past. Yes, a Python was used in the 1970s television show “Starsky and Hutch” and also appears in “The Walking Dead.” It is also featured in the video game “Call of Duty: Black Ops.” But while there’s been some exposure on the silver screen, no single movie appearance has ever created a major spike in snake-gun demand. Remember how values skyrocketed on S&W Model 29s almost overnight once Dirty Harry started ventilating bad guys with his? Then semi-automatics were hot for a while, including the Auto Mag and especially the .50 AE Desert Eagle. Many movie moguls back then preferred a brutish hand cannon to wow the audiences, and the Python to them represented a refined target pistol in an anemic onscreen caliber.

Of Colt’s seven “serpents,” Pythons remain among the hottest and most desirable. This Custom Shop “Colt President’s Edition” was specially ordered for Colt’s president, Gary French, during 1988. Factory gold inlays always make a dramatic value increase in any Colt revolver, and this one has been initialed by Master Engravers Alvin A. White and Steve Kamyk, making it a truly unique Python.

Values on snake guns, mostly Pythons and Diamondbacks, gradually started going up approximately eight years ago. Nice Pythons had been stuck in the $1,000 to $1,200 range for a while, and then quickly passed the $1,500 level, followed by breaking the $2,000 barrier not long after. These escalating prices were mostly driven by a few collectors who believed there was more upside market potential in the future than downside risk at the time. This triggered additional collector activity and buying (a crowd loves a crowd), investment speculation, and some greed that added to the increased demand mix about five years ago. The feeding frenzy was then officially underway on all snake guns. Unlike AR-15s, there is no fear of potential anti-gun legislation driving the increase in demand on the politically correct six-shot revolvers—yet.
Today’s crazed and hungry buyers are now devouring all the snake meat they can sink their teeth into, in record quantities, but don’t forget that even the hungriest collectors stop eating when they’re full.
So Who’s Buying?
A lot of today’s male baby boomers are in their peak earning years or are starting to retire. What are they doing with their extra disposable income, considering their 401k, retirement funds and other investments are flush? Buying stuff they had, or wished they’d had, back when they were growing up in their testosterone-filled years during the turbulent rock ‘n’ roll ’60s and early ’70s. This includes Ford Mustangs, Camaros, Barracudas, Colt Cobras/Pythons/Diamondbacks, and probably some period music and sports memorabilia as well.
But why are they buying this stuff now when it’s become so expensive? Because they can afford it, and because these collectibles have actually taken on another very important dimension for them. They’ve become relatively inexpensive time machines transporting the owners back to the vivid memories of their misspent youth, including the nostalgic warmth of drive-ins with $1.50 cheeseburger/fries and milkshakes, great hunting and shooting with families and friends, and the adrenaline rush of high school/college sporting events.

While the Boa was manufactured by Colt under contract for Lew Horton Distributors as a special edition in 1985, it was never listed in a Colt price sheet or catalog. Only 1,200 were manufactured with consecutive serial numbers by barrel length—600 in 4″ and 600 in 6″. While hard to imagine, a set of Boas in today’s marketplace will fetch a premium price tag of more than $30,000!

These snake-gun owners have a completely different buying profile than the AR-15 speculators between 2008 and 2012, who were buying a $750-$850 AR for $1,300 and putting it on their credit cards. This “herd of buffalo” was already spooked and running when the Obama administration took over in 2008, but the real stampede started after the Sandy Hook tragedy in 2012. The herd kept running non-stop for more than five years, and was driven by fear, greed and speculation, creating an unprecedented amount of demand for tactical firearms. Now the herd is worn out and resting, with many of them having lost more than 40 percent on their tactical “investments.”
This isn’t the makeup of today’s snake-bitten buyers, who are paying cash for their expensive purchases, but seem to be more concerned about being able to afford the price today rather than thinking about what the value could be tomorrow. In any collectible marketplace where there have been sizable increases in value within a relatively short period of time—value sustainability is directly dependant on continued or increasing demand.
Will The Party Last?
Since there’s plenty of supply on most snake-gun variations, demand will be the critical factor on whether these venomous revolvers can hold their values in the future. Personally, I think this craze will subside shortly, and when it does, a second one won’t occur because most of the demand will already have been satisfied. When J. Paul Getty was asked how he accumulated his vast fortune his answer was, “Easy, I sold when everybody else was buying, and bought when everybody else was selling!”

This stainless steel King Cobra in .357 Mag. was manufactured between 1986 and 1998. Note the solid rib on the barrel and the full-length underlug protecting the cylinder pin, in addition to the black neoprene finger-grooved stocks with medallions. Available with either 2½” (rarest), 4″, 6″ or 8″ barrel, this 4″ King Cobra’s current value is approximately $2,400.

When moving to Minneapolis in 1980, I got a job with Investment Rarities, one of America’s leading precious metals dealers. My first day at work was on July 19, and while walking into the large area of broker cubicles, it was already hectic and noisy at 8:30 a.m., as all the phones were ringing non-stop. Most of the calls were from desperate people trying to buy gold and silver that had undergone a sharp spike in price during the past 12 months. That July, the price of an ounce of gold and silver ended up at $1,826 and $44.78, respectively. Less than two years later, prices (not values) had plummeted to $762 and $13.87. Thirty-five years later, these investors originally driven by market speculation and some fear, still show signs of investment scar tissue. After all, they lost almost 60 percent on gold and 70 percent on silver after only two years, and today, their precious metals are still in bracketed numbers. Now they truly understand when getting caught up in the turmoil of a speculative marketplace, assessing the downside risk is a lot more important than trying to catch an investment wave on the way up.
Having these historical facts in tabular form (and perhaps rubbing your crystal ball vigorously), you can draw your own conclusions regarding whether snake guns will continue their blistering investment performance pace. It also might not be a bad idea to have an anti-venom snake kit nearby when getting close to these seven deadly serpents.
Editor’s Note: 
NRA Life Member S.P. Fjestad is the author and publisher of the Blue Book Of Gun Values, with more than 1.7 million copies in circulation worldwide. Blue Book Publications, Inc., will be releasing a new Colt Snake Gun book in late September entitled Seven Serpents—the History of Colt’s Snake Guns by Gurney Brown. Visit bluebookofgunvalues.comfor more information, availability and pricing.

Categories
All About Guns

ROHM GMBH MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION .38 Special

ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 2
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 3
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 4
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 5
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 6
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 7
ROHM GMBH - MOD.38S 4 INCH BARREL DOUBLE ACTION - Picture 8
I guess that it is better than nothing!

Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

The Federal "Shutdown" explained

Inline image 2

Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

I can just hear some Lifer going "Hell Yeah, Why did I not think of it!"

Image result for funniest gun memes

Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

Where do I sign?

Categories
All About Guns

The 1885 Browning High Wall

Someday I will own one of these puppies! The only things stopping me is. That they are as rare as hens teeth. (I guess no one wants to sell theirs.)
The other and major reason being. That they cost an arm & a leg. But no doubt they are worth every penny of it.
Grumpy
Image result for 1885 Browning High Wall
Image result for 1885 Browning High Wall
Image result for 1885 Browning High Wall

Compared: The Browning 1885
And Ruger No. 1 Rifles 
By Chuck Hawks 

The Browning 1885 and Ruger No. 1 falling block single shot rifles represent the best that two of the major American arms makers have to offer. Elegant, finely crafted and finished, and smooth in operation, they are as good as production rifles get.The Browning was based on a somewhat modernized version of John Browning’s first rifle design, which was later sold to Winchester and introduced by that company as the Model 1885. The Model 1885 came in two versions, a lightweight model for cartridges of moderate power with a low receiver wall and a heavier version for the most powerful cartridges of the day with a high receiver wall. Thus the Low Wall and High Wall nomenclature.
The Ruger is a modern rifle based on the aesthetics of the British Farquharson design. It combines modern design and production technology with classic lines. Ruger offers several variations on the No. 1 theme, including the No. 1A Light Sporter (roughly equivalent to the Browning Low Wall) and the No. 1B Standard, a heavier model more equivalent to the Browning High Wall.
All of these falling block rifles are loaded and cocked when the under lever is operated to lower the breechblock for loading. After a cartridge is manually placed in the chamber, the lever is pulled back and the massive breech block slides up and seals the chamber. The rifle is then cocked and ready to shoot.
The Winchester/Browning Model 1885
Winchester 1885 Low Wall
M-1885 Low Wall. Illustration courtesy of U.S. Repeating Arms Co.
Browning produced the modern Model 1885 High Wall from 1985-2001. The standard version of the High Wall was produced in calibers .22-250 Remington, .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, .30-06 Springfield, and .45-70 Government.
The petite Low Wall, sold under the Browning name from 1995 to 2001, came in .22 Hornet, .223 Remington, .243 Winchester, and .260 Remington. As I write this in 2003, the Low Wall is offered under the Winchester name (Browning and Winchester are both owned by the same Belgian interests) in caliber .17 HMR only.
Among the distinguishing features of the Browning 1885’s are a free floating octagon barrel, self-cocking rebounding hammer, user adjustable trigger pull weight, highly polished high luster blue barreled action, gold plated trigger, select straight walnut stock and Schnabel forearm graced by plenty of cut checkering and a durable glossy finish. Detachable sling swivel posts are included, as are solid recoil pads on selected calibers. All standard models are drilled and tapped for scope mounts; only rifles in .45-70 caliber come standard with iron sights. The forearm is attached directly to the receiver on a husky hanger that prevents wood to barrel contact.
The High Wall includes an ejector (which can be set to eject to the right, left, or extract only), while the Low Wall extracts but does not eject the fired case. Another difference was the pistol grip buttstock supplied on the Low Wall, while the High Wall came with a straight hand stock. High wall rifles come with a heavy octagon barrel while Low Wall rifles come with a light contour octagon barrel. Low wall rifles weigh about 6.25 pounds; High Wall rifles weigh about 8.75 pounds, plus or minus an ounce or two. Both actions are extremely slick and smooth in operation.
The Ruger No. 1
Ruger No. 1-S
Ruger No. 1S. Illustration courtesy of Sturm, Ruger, Inc.
Introduced in 1966 and still going strong, the No. 1 single shot rifle was one of Bill Ruger’s pet projects. It was the first of the modern single shot rifles. The No. 1 uses a completely modern but classic looking Farquharson-style falling block action of great strength. The barreled action is finished in a polished deep blue, and the hand fitted, select walnut stock is hand checkered in a borderless pattern. The No. 1 is Ruger’s premium rifle.
There are several variations of the No. 1. The two models that are most similar to the two Browning 1885 models are also perhaps the most typical No. 1’s: the No. 1-A Light Sporter (22 inch round barrel, Alexander Henry forearm), and the No. 1-B Standard Rifle (26 inch round barrel, semi-beavertail forearm). The 1-A weighs 6.25 pounds while the 1-B weighs 8 pounds.
No. 1-A calibers include .243 Winchester, .270 Winchester, 7×57, and .30-06. No. 1-B calibers include .218 Bee, .22 Hornet, .223 Remington, .22-250, .220 Swift, .243 Winchester, 6mm Remington, .257 Roberts, .25-06, .270 Winchester, .270 Weatherby Magnum, .280 Remington, 7mm Remington Magnum, .308 Winchester, .30-06, .300 Winchester Magnum, .300 Weatherby Magnum, and .338 Winchester Magnum.
Both of these models feature satin finished stocks with a black recoil pad, a sculptured receiver, a trigger adjustable for weight of pull, a sliding shotgun-type tang mounted safety, an ejector which can be set for extraction only, a quarter rib barrel with integral scope base, sling swivel studs, and Ruger scope rings. The 1-A is furnished with open iron sights.
The forearm of all No. 1 rifles is suspended from a forearm hanger extending out from the receiver beneath the barrel. In concept this is similar to the forearm hanger of the Browning 1885, but the Ruger version is less massive. To quote from my article Modern Classic: The Ruger No. 1:
“Like many Ruger No. 1 rifles, varying the pressure on the forearm of the test rifle would change the point of impact of the bullet. This is due to flex in the forearm hanger, which allows the forearm to make contact with the supposedly free floating barrel. The fix is to have a gunsmith drill and tap the forearm hanger near its end for a set screw, which is then adjusted to put a constant pressure against the underside of the barrel, eliminating the flex in the forearm hanger and keeping the forearm away from the barrel.”
Not all No. 1 rifles require this fix, but many do. The No. 1B rifle fired for groups (see below) had the set screw installed in the forearm hanger.
The comparison – Browning 1885 and Ruger No. 1
While both rifles come with user adjustable triggers, the Browning’s steel trigger assembly is the superior unit. The aluminum Ruger trigger assembly is adjustable for weight of pull, but some owners find that it still requires too much pressure at its minimum setting and has too much creep. Many simply replace the stock Ruger trigger with a quality after market unit.
As mentioned above, all Browning 1885 models use a free floating barrel suspended from a beefy forearm hanger mounted directly to the receiver that does not let the forearm touch the barrel. This heavy-duty forearm hanger avoids the problem of the forearm touching the barrel that plagues the No. 1.
Judging by the samples I have seen the Browning is usually supplied with a higher grade of walnut and definitely has a more extensive checkering pattern. The 1885 comes with a high gloss finish on the butt stock and forearm that really brings out the figure of the wood. Likewise, the 1885’s barreled action is meticulously polished, and Browning’s deep luster blue metal finish shows this off to superior advantage. They are both very handsome rifles, but the Brownings clearly receive more Tender Loving Care at the factory.
Both the Low Wall and No. 1A are available in four calibers. But the range of available calibers is different. The light Browning rifle is chambered only for relatively mild, short action calibers ranging from .22 Hornet to .260 Remington. This helps keep recoil tolerable.
The No. 1A is chambered for calibers ranging from the .243 Winchester to the powerful .30-06 Springfield. Considering the recoil of the .270 and .30-06 cartridges, for which the No. 1A is chambered, the Ruger’s extra pound of weight is justified. In fact, the No. 1B is noticeably more pleasant to shoot than either the Low Wall or the No. 1A in equivalent calibers, and the heavy High Wall is the most user friendly of all.
The Low Wall is a slimmer and lighter rifle than the Ruger No. 1-A Light Sporter, and the Low Wall features a 24 inch barrel while the Ruger comes with a 22″ barrel, giving the Low Wall a potential ballistic advantage. The Low Wall’s light weight may make it a better mountain rifle, but the heavier No. 1A’s greater range of calibers may make it the more versatile rifle.
On the other hand, the High Wall is about 3/4 pound heavier than the No. 1B Standard rifle. Both are chambered for cartridges of similar power, but the No. 1B offers a much better selection of calibers. In hard kicking calibers the High Wall’s extra weight is a benefit, particularly at the range, but the Ruger 1B is handier and easier to carry in the field.
At the range
Shooting was done from sandbags at a bench rest with a Browning Low Wall in .243 Winchester caliber and a Ruger No. 1B in the similar 6mm Remington caliber, the same rifles reviewed in previous articles (which can be found on the Product Review Page). For this comparison, both rifles wore Leupold 3-9x scopes.
Before installation of the set screw to stabilize the forearm hanger, the Ruger had averaged 2″ groups at 100 meters using factory loaded ammunition. After the set screw was installed and adjusted, 3-shot 100 meter groups with Remington factory loaded 100 grain PSP Core-Lokt bullets shrank to just a touch over 1″.
The Browning Low Wall provided similar performance although, as is so often the case, with different ammunition. The best the Low Wall would do with Remington Express factory loads using the 100 grain PSP Core-Lokt bullet was 1.5″ groups at 100 meters. When Winchester Supreme factory loads with the 95 grain Ballistic Silvertip bullet were tested, 3-shot groups measured right at 1″ on the 100 meter outdoor range.
Both rifles would shoot an occasional larger or smaller than average group, which is what happens when a live human being (me in this case) is pulling the trigger. I would venture to say that in terms of accuracy these two rifles are functionally equal.
Conclusion
Both the Browning 1885 and the Ruger No. 1 are excellent, high quality, premium rifles built for the carriage trade. Functionally, once the triggers have been adjusted and the Ruger’s forearm hanger stabilized (if necessary), the two are essentially equal in performance. However, everyone I know who owns both (including myself) considers the Browning the superior rifle.
Let me interject that I am a big fan of The Ruger No. 1, and I consider it my second favorite among all (not just single shot) factory produced centerfire hunting rifles. But the Browning 1885 remains my favorite. The quality, workmanship, fit, and finish are simply superior.
Note: Individual, full length reviews of Winchester/Browning Model 1885 and Ruger No. 1 rifles can be found on the Product Reviews page.

 

  In 1878, the 23-year-old John Browning designed a falling-block single-shot rifle, for which he was granted a patent the following year.
Browning and his brother commenced making the rifles by hand in their second-floor workshop in Ogden, Utah, with limited success.
In 1883, Thomas G. Bennett, Vice-President and General Manager of the Winchester Repeating Arms Company. Traveled to Ogden and negotiated the purchase of the single-shot design.
Image result for Thomas G. Bennett, Vice-President and General Manager of the Winchester Repeating Arms Company
As well as the prototype of what would become the Model 1886 lever-action.Image result for 1886 lever-action
Thus the beginning of the fruitful 20-year Winchester–Browning collaboration.
Winchester’s engineers made some improvements to Browning’s design, including angling the block at six degrees to create a positive breech seal, and released the rifle as the Model 1885.
Two popular models were made, the so-called Low Wall which showed an exposed hammer, firing less powerful cartridges.Image result for low wall rifle
And the so-called High Wall for stronger cartridges whose steel frame covered most of the firing hammer when viewed from the side; but both were officially marketed by Winchester as the Single Shot Rifle.Image result for 1885 high wall rifle
It was produced principally to satisfy the demands of the growing sport of long-range “Match Shooting”. Which opened at Creedmoor, New York, on June 21, 1872.
As Target/Match shooting was extremely popular in the US from about 1871 until about 1917.Related image
Enjoying a status similar to golf today, and the Winchester company. Which had built its reputation on repeating firearms.
Image result for 1885 high wall rifle
Winchester had in 1885 challenged the single-shot giants of Sharps, Remington, Stevens, Maynard, Ballard et al.
Not only entering the competition, but excelling at it, with Major Ned H. Roberts (inventor of the .257 Roberts cartridge) describing the Model 1885 Single Shot as “the most reliable, strongest, and altogether best single shot rifle ever produced.
Winchester produced nearly 140,000 Single Shot rifles from 1885 to 1920, and it was found that the falling-block Model 1885 had been built with one of the strongest actions known at that time.
The falling block action was so strong that the Winchester Company used it to test fire newly created rifle cartridges. To satisfy the needs of the shooting and hunting public. The Model 1885 Single Shot was eventually produced in more calibers than any other Winchester rifle.” Image result for 1885 high wall rifle