Categories
All About Guns

A nice looking Smith & Wesson Model 59 in 9mm

Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4
Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4
Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4
Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4
Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4
Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4
Smith & Wesson - S&W Model 59, Blue & Black 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
All About Guns

Winchester Model 88, Blue 22" Lever Action Detachable Box Magazine Fed Rifle in caliber .308 Win.

 

Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22
Winchester - Model 88, Blue 22

  A Winchester Model 88 lever action rifle with a 22” barrel chambered in .308 Win. The rifle is blued with a walnut stock having pressed basketweave and oak leaf pattern at the grip, pistol grip, grip cap and its original checkered black plastic buttplate.
This model was made from 1955 to 1975, and was about the only Winchester lever action model chambered in a rifle cartridge without an external hammer. It also has a removable magazine vs. the tubular magazine used on Winchester’s other lever action rifles. This rifle is in about Very Good-Plus condition with a bright bore and sharp rifling.
 The .308 Win. cartridge is a great cartridge for deer and antelope, but in its heavier loadings can also be used on elk. Anyone who hunts in the woods will appreciate its short 22” barrel and fast handling characteristics for fast shots on running game.
Categories
I am so grateful!! This great Nation & Its People

just another example of the Greatness of this Country of ours!


All we need is some cold beer, Pizza, Hot Dogs and some Apple Pie! Grumpy

Categories
All About Guns

This would work for me!

Image result for get a shotgun licence
Related image

Categories
Being Stranger in a Strange Land Born again Cynic!

I found this, Why the Left likes to block roads, bridges, harass people….

I saw this article by Dennis Prager and here is the Article.  I cut and pasted it in its entirety.
It is a very good article and I was pleased to see someone that said the same thing that I have said.  The average leftist believe that they are superior due to their education, being “woke”, social standing and other factors and that we “normals” are subhuman, Nazi’s and other vile things.

When I was in graduate school, I learned a lot about the left.
One lesson was that while most liberals and conservatives abide by society’s rules of order and decency, most leftists do not feel bound to live by these same rules.
I watched the way leftist Vietnam War protesters treated fellow students and professors. I watched left-wing students make “nonnegotiable demands” of college administrations. I saw the Black Panthers engage in violence—including torture and murder—and be financially rewarded by leftists.
Today, we watch leftist mobs scream profanities at professors and deans, and shut down conservative and pro-Israel speakers at colleges.
We routinely witness left-wing protesters block highways and bridges, scream in front of the homes of conservative business and political leaders, and surround conservatives’ tables at restaurants while shouting and chanting at them.
Conservatives don’t do these things. They don’t close highways, yell obscenities at left-wing politicians, work to ban left-wing speakers at colleges, smash the windows of businesses, etc.
Why do leftists feel entitled do all these things? Because they have thoroughly rejected middle-class, bourgeois, and Judeo-Christian religious values.
Leftists are the only source of their values. Leftists not only believe they know what is right—conservatives, too, believe they are right—but they also believe they are morally superior to all others.
Leftists are Ubermenschen—people on such a high moral plane that they do not consider themselves bound by the normal conventions of civics and decency. Leftists don’t need such guidelines; only the non-left—the “deplorables”—need them.
In August 2017, University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax wrote a column for the Philadelphia Inquirer in defense of middle-class values. She and her co-author cited a list of behavioral norms that, as Wax put it, “was almost universally endorsed between the end of World War II and the mid-1960s.”
They were: “Get married before you have children and strive to stay married for their sake. Get the education you need for gainful employment, work hard, and avoid idleness.
Go the extra mile for your employer or client. Be a patriot, ready to serve the country. Be neighborly, civic-minded, and charitable. Avoid coarse language in public. Be respectful of authority. Eschew substance abuse and crime.”
She later wrote in The Wall Street Journal, “The fact that the ‘bourgeois culture’ these norms embodied has broken down since the 1960s largely explains today’s social pathologies—and re-embracing that culture would go a long way toward addressing those pathologies.”
For her left-wing colleagues at Penn Law School, this list was beyond the pale. About half of her fellow professors of law—33 of them—condemned her in an open letter. And Wax wrote in the Journal, “My law school dean recently asked me to take a leave of absence next year and to cease teaching a mandatory first-year course.”
The Pennsylvania chapter of the left-wing National Lawyers Guild condemned her for espousing bourgeois values and questioned “whether it is appropriate for her to continue to teach a required first-year course.”
As regards traditional Jewish and Christian codes of conduct, just read the left’s contempt for Vice President Mike Pence’s religiosity. They fear him more than President Donald Trump solely for that reason.
One would think that leftists, as sensitive as they are to sexual harassment of women, would admire Pence’s career-long policy of never dining alone with a woman other than his wife. On the contrary, they mock him for it.
With such high self-esteem and no middle-class, bourgeois, or Judeo-Christian values to guide them, many leftists are particularly vicious people.
The opening skit of “Saturday Night Live” this past weekend—Matt Damon’s mockery of Judge Brett Kavanaugh—provided a timely example.
It is unimaginable that a prominent conservative group or individual would feature a skit mocking Kavanaugh’s accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Indeed, Kavanaugh noted his 10-year-old daughter’s prayer for his accuser, and a political cartoonist promptly drew a cartoon with her praying that God forgive her “angry, lying, alcoholic father for sexually assaulting Dr. Ford.”
Is there an equally prominent conservative public figure on the right who has ever said “F— Obama!” on national television just as Robert De Niro shouted, “F— Trump!” at the recent Tony Awards?
Now, why would De Niro feel he could shout an obscenity at the president of the United States with millions of young people watching him? Because he is not constrained by middle-class or Judeo-Christian moral values.
In Nietzsche’s famous words, De Niro, like other leftists, is “beyond good and evil,” as Americans understood those terms until the 1960s.
In 2016, at a Comedy Central roast of actor Rob Lowe, the butt of the jokes was Ann Coulter, not Lowe. They mostly mocked her looks, and if there is something crueler than publicly mocking a woman’s looks, it’s hard to identify. For example, “Saturday Night Live” cast member Pete Davidson said, “Ann Coulter, if you’re here, who’s scaring the crows away from our crops?”
There surely are mean conservatives—witness some of the vile comments by anonymous conservative commenters on the internet. And it is a moral scandal that Ford has received death threats.
The difference in left-wing meanness is the meanness of known—not anonymous—people on the left. They don’t hide behind anonymity because they do not feel bound by traditional notions of civility, for which they have contempt.
Now you can understand why the left hates Pence, a man who has, by all accounts, led a thoroughly honorable life. He—and other evangelical Christians and Orthodox Jews—tries to live by a code that is higher than him.
That ethic is what Ubermenschen seek to destroy. They are succeeding

Categories
All About Guns Allies Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Interesting stuff Useful Shit

How to Buy a Springfield 1903 or 1903a3 the Best Mauser Clone Ever

Categories
All About Guns

Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 in .45-70 Govt.



Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 3
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 4
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 5
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 6
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 7
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 8
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 9
Springfield Armory Model 1879 U.S. Trapdoor (1873), Blue & Case Colored, 32 ½” - Single Shot Military Rifle MFD 1884 Antique No FFL - Picture 10

 

  The Model 1873 “Trapdoor” Springfield was the first standard-issue breech-loading rifle adopted by the United States Army.
  The Model 1873, Model 1884 and 1888 Trapdoors were the main service rifles of the U.S. Military until they were gradually replaced by the Springfield Model 1892 bolt-action rifle.
  The Model 1879 was not an official model, but came about to make collecting rifles easier. The differences between the Model 1879 and 1873 models were a longer comb and a thicker receiver with a low arched breechblock.
  This is a Model 1879 rifle with an original finish. It retains clear markings including the cartouche on the left side of the stock and the scripted proof mark behind the lower tang.
Categories
California

Do count your Blessings!

Categories
Allies

Colion Noir – The California Ammo Background Check is A Gun Owner Penalty Tax

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Being Stranger in a Strange Land Born again Cynic! Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Grumpy's hall of Shame

Just another reason Why I am a Happy RETIRED TEACHER

14-Year-Old Posts Picture of Airsoft Gun on Snapchat, School Suspends Him for 3 Weeks

The principal calls it “very, very serious” wrongdoing.

|

A Maryland eighth grader was suspended for three weeks and did not get to graduate with his class in June. This was his punishment for appearing in the background of a friend’s video in which said friend held a disabled airsoft gun. The eighth grader also posed for a photo with the friend, who held him in a headlock with the fake gun pointing at his head. The picture was shared with 13 other friends on Snapchat.

Are you silently giving thanks that social media didn’t exist when you were a middle schooler? Me too. The 14-year-old boy later admitted he was trying to look like a “badass.”

On Monday his dad—David Bernstein, a nonprofit director—wrote a piece about the incident for The Washington Post. He said he had asked the private Silver Spring school to reconsider the punishment. After all, his son did not threaten anyone with a gun. He did not own a gun. He did not say anything about wanting to kill students, or take his own life, or do anything violent. He was, his dad wrote, just being a “knucklehead.”

But the school insisted the incident was “very, very serious” and therefore warranted suspension through the end of the year.

I’m just not sure how serious it is to be in a photo or video that is stupid but ultimately unthreatening and harmless. But anyway, in an email to me, Bernstein added that this was not the first time he was dismayed by the administration’s take on things.

“I first realized something was amiss at the school when I received a call earlier in the year about another ‘very serious’ incident,” said Bernstein. “My son had told a friend that he observed a teacher texting while driving. He was then hauled into the principal’s office and asked to apologize to the teacher, which he only did reluctantly. ‘The teacher was very hurt,’ the principal stated. ‘And [your son] didn’t seem to care.’ Confused about the ‘crime,’ I asked the principal what if my son was telling the truth. ‘That’s beside the point,’ she said. ‘He violated our community values by hurting the teacher’s feelings.'”

You don’t have to be John Grisham to sense something is a little off here. On the one hand, a child is punished for reporting an actual danger: a texting driver. On the other hand, the same child is punished for participating in a video and photo that did not represent an actual danger.

Clearly the school is very worried about feelings and not so worried about reality. It worried that the teacher accused of texting would feel hurt. And it worried that students might feel “anxiety” if they heard about or saw the video or snap.

In this way, the school is tutoring its students in safetyism—the word Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff use in The Coddling of the American Mind to describe the demand for pointless safety measures. The students are being taught to believe that they are literally unsafe when actually they are just uncomfortable—and that the administration is required to respond.

Note that responding doesn’t actually make kids any safer, because they were not in any real danger to begin with.

As for the three-week suspension, it seems to mirror the criminal justice system’s obsession with longer and longer sentences. Seems like any kid who is told to “reflect” on his actions for three days has done enough reflecting. “Indeed,” Bernstein noted in his piece, “multiple studies show that long-term suspensions make for worse, not better behavior.”

But of course, Bernstein is dealing with reality. The school is not.